This writer remembers when the Left would mock Christians for believing that prayer worked, and how the Left would argue that if we did away with religion we'd have an enlightened society based on science and logic.

Instead, we ended up with a quasi-religious devotion to science that involves believing there are 57 genders and we can control the weather if we eat bugs, use the right words, and vote for Kamala Harris:

She doesn't even realize how anti-science this is.

The Biden-Harris administration admitted the Inflation Reduction Act was actually a climate change bill. Why didn't it control the weather?

It's all a cover for what they really want: socialism under the guise of 'environmentalism.'

LOL - the Left always end up eating their own.

If we just ban cars and gas stoves it'll all be better!

This writer always asks Lefties like AOC this question: what should&nbsp;the temperature be in NYC on November 5? They can say the temperature is too warm or too cold, but they can never answer that question.

{ai:summary}The writer critiques the Left's shift from mocking religious beliefs to embracing a quasi-religious faith in science, particularly regarding climate change and gender identity. They highlight Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez's comments on voting to control the weather as an example of this contradiction.The piece argues that despite claims of scientific enlightenment, the government's actions do not align with the promised outcomes, such as controlling weather patterns through policy. The writer questions the feasibility of these claims and suggests that underlying motives may be more about advancing socialism than genuine environmental concern. #politics

AOC Thinks Voting for Kamala Harris Will Control the Weather in New York

Loading...