From its inception, legacy media ‘journalists’ have labeled Substack a haven for extremism. With their old outlets now crumbling, these same ‘journos’ are rushing to Substack to find relevancy in the changing media landscape. Surprise!

That ‘journalists’ are lying, hypocrites should shock no one.

These proud peacocks of the dying legacy media are about to get their feathers extremely ruffled. No, it’s worst - they’re about to be completely plucked!

The turnaround from ‘Substack is full of racists’ to ‘Where do I sign up’ is hilarious to behold. Commenters are laughing.

We’ve already seen Jim Acosta’s awkward transition from CNN anchor to Substack ‘star.’ It’s <a href="https://twitchy.com/warren-squire/2025/01/31/jim-acosta-substsck-show-debut-n2407634" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">bad</a>. The Jen Rubin and Norm Eisen show is equally horrible. Substack used to be hip. The influx of legacy media 'journos' could soon make it a haven for has-beens.

{ai:summary}Legacy media journalists, previously critical of Substack as a platform for extremism, are now flocking to the site in search of relevance as their traditional outlets decline. This shift has sparked skepticism about their motivations and marketability, with many questioning whether their followers will support them financially in this new venture.The irony of their transition from denouncing Substack to embracing it has not gone unnoticed, leading to commentary that suggests these former media figures may struggle to maintain their audience. As they attempt to carve out new identities on Substack, some predict it could become a refuge for those deemed irrelevant in the evolving media landscape. #culture

Acosta, Rubin and Other Legacy Media Castoffs Risk Turning Substack into a Haven for Has-Beens

Loading...