Apparently, the Gazans are starving, though you wouldn’t know it from the pictures of the Palestinian fatsos in the background of the kids with chronic wasting diseases that the Cecil B. DeMilles of Pallywood are trying to pass off as victims of Israeli meanness. The nerve of those Jews – it’s always the Jews, you know – for fighting back against a bunch of psychotic Marxist/jihadi freaks who initiated this war with a rape/killing spree and are now crying like little girls because they are righteously getting their behinds kicked. Israel should ignore the invertebrates and double down on defeating them.
We are solemnly informed by the moral illiterates of the left and its regime media adjuncts that we must care about Palestine’s children, though there is no Palestine, nor should there ever be. But it’s baffling why we are supposed to care more about Palestine‘s children than the Palestinians do. The Palestinians care about them not at all – if they cared about them, they wouldn’t raise them into adult semi-human savages, nor would they start wars they can’t win. But of course, losing is their strategy – they want to lose so hard and so badly that the tofu-spined cowards of the West invert the moral paradigm and force the righteous retribution to stop and the rule of the terrorists to be preserved.
Count me out of that bizarre, evil moral calculus. Israel must win, unequivocally and hard. If the Palestinians want to eat, they can release the hostages. Again, none of us is under any moral obligation to care more about them than they care about themselves.
But, of course, the argument that the Palestinians should not have started the war, and should not perpetuate it by keeping innocent Israelis that they kidnapped and tortured for nearly two years in their grim dungeons, is now officially off-limits. We’re seeing a coordinated pushback against the idea of expecting the Palestinians to release the hostages if they want the war to end. We are not supposed to state the obvious, that the Palestinians can end this war by ending their captivity of the innocents anytime they want. Naturally, the sorry, feminine likes of David French have weighed in in favor of adopting a civilizational cuckold strategy, making the Christian Case for Total Submission to Muslim Supremacism.
We’re told this is an immoral argument for reasons that are never explained. It’s actually a strong argument that normal people understand and therefore must somehow be put off-limits. It’s so effective because it’s so obviously true that the Marxist/jihadi alliance must declare it unspeakable. It’s akin to someone accused of racism countering that some of his best friends are minorities. That’s a great argument that one is not racist, and therefore it’s an argument that cannot be made because it undermines the whole morally bankrupt premises of the accusations. It’s the same here. Their whole narrative strategy is based on the idea that Palestinians lack any kind of agency or ability to control the savage impulses of their seventh-century ideology, and the second you point out that they could end their pain in an instant, you utterly neutralize the Marxist/jihadi narrative.
It’s always amusing how they attempt to use the language of morality to try to get us to surrender to the forces of immoral Marxist/jihadi barbarism. It works on a lot of people, because a lot of people are stupid, but the greatest insult is not their epithets but that they think it might actually work on us. They must think we are as stupid as their supporters.
They want to leverage your conscience to make you do what they want, living out that popular meme where the smug femboy tells you that you should be doing something because Jesus said so, even though he holds Christians in contempt. But our morality is not a suicide pact, in this case, a suicide pact that we never entered into and that is being presented to us as a fait accompli, complete with the expectation that we will participate in it because of reasons and shut up, racist colonialist.
That’s why it’s important to be utterly indifferent to their ham-handed attempts to distract from the fact that they want to see all the Jews murdered and the barbarians take over Israel. And after that’s done, they want to murder the rest of us in the West. Some of the dumber ones will even go off-script and tell you that, but for some reason, you’re morally obligated not to believe it. Remember, globalizing the intifada doesn’t mean going on a mass killing spree around the globe. It means hugging or something, and if you think any differently, you’re a racist colonialist.
No.
Our enemies have no moral standing. Everything they say is a lie. We cannot let them morally browbeat us into choosing suicide. The ugly truth is that Jews can’t die in enough numbers for their enemies to stop hating them. But that also applies to those of us who are not Jewish. Our Marxist/jihadi enemies would not break stride if they made their Holocaust II fantasy come true (their perverse fantasy of “from the river to the sea, Palestine will be free” means free of breathing Jews) and would immediately get onto killing the rest of us. That’s why I’m going to side with civilization and continue to advocate for the total destruction of the Marxist/jihadist enemy.
The Gazans are enduring hardships, but this is not a bug. It is a feature. Bad things should happen to people who start wars, particularly with grotesque rape and murder sprees. This tends to discourage future wars, but understand that the Marxist/jihadi doesn’t want to discourage future wars. The Marxist/jihadi wants to win future wars and intends to do so by morally hamstringing those fighting against it.
Israel should have cut off all food, water, and power to Gaza on October 7. That’s how sieges work. It should have attacked with unrestrained fury until the enemy was completely annihilated. That’s how wars are fought, with the objective being victory. It’s how they’ve always been fought throughout history. When did it suddenly become the duty of the side winning a war to start taking care of the enemy’s logistical needs during the war? I find it bizarre that not only would some people expect the forces of civilization to fight in a manner unknown to human beings before last week – somehow the righteous besieger is now responsible for the logistic support of those resisting the siege – but that people within the scope of civilization would accept this concept.
We are under no moral obligation to allow the enemies of civilization to survive. That means finish Hamas. If their families suffer as a result of their conduct, they are free to relieve that suffering by total and unconditional surrender. Enemies of humanity must be defeated. Anybody who is a friend of the swamp of human waste known as Hamas is an enemy of humanity.
The only way we can lose the war against the semi-human savages of Marxist/jihadi barbarism is to choose to be defeated. That choice manifests as refusing to win the war in the way that human beings have won wars for 5,000 years. The choice to embrace brand-new rules and norms that have never existed within the history of conflict, which somehow shield the aggressor from righteous retribution, is a suicidal one, and we must have no part of it.
Remember, the Marxist/jihadi axis and their pathetic, morally illiterate American and other Western allies would gleefully cheer as you are actively exterminated. If we submit to their moral blackmail, they will have the chance to exterminate you actively, and they will do it. The only way they can defeat you is if you are both weak and stupid enough to submit. Reject the aptly named David French and his fellow submissives.
The answer to the Gaza problem is to annihilate Hamas and anybody helping it. It is to inflict righteous retribution such that no one dares start another war. This is what history teaches. This is the way.
Join the fight for America by enlisting in Townhall VIP right now. You get access to a bunch of great stuff, not the least of which is my extra Wednesday column, my weekly Stream of Kurtiousness videos every Friday, and his Unredacted podcast every Monday! Plus, some stuff from Larry O’Connor – and more!
Follow Kurt on Twitter @KurtSchlichter and order Kurt Schlichter’s action-packed new novel, American Apocalypse: The Second Civil War out now!
Get Kurt Schlichter and Irina Moises’s noir fantasy novel, Lost Angeles: Silver Bullets On The Sunset Strip! Also, check out Kurt’s Kelly Turnbull People’s Republic series of conservative action novels.