Dr. Joe Wolverton II, J.D., Constitutional Law Scholar for The John Birch Society, explains what’s wrong with the so-called “SAVE Act” that is widely popular among conservatives, who hope it will prevent illegal aliens from voting in U.S. elections. Dr. Wolverton, who read the 26-page proposed legislation, gives a deep-dive explanation of everything that’s wrong with it, and why true conservatives and guardians of the Constitution ought to oppose it — based on federalism and states’ rights. Wolverton also explains how the bill would actually enable the children of illegal aliens born in the United States to vote in future elections.

Dr. Joe Wolverton II, J.D., Constitutional Law Scholar for The John Birch Society, explains what’s wrong with the so-called “SAVE Act” that is widely popular among conservatives, who hope it will prevent illegal aliens from voting in U.S. elections. Dr. Wolverton, who read the 26-page proposed legislation, gives a deep-dive explanation of everything that’s wrong ...{ai:summary}<p>Dr. Joe Wolverton II critiques the "SAVE Act," a bill favored by conservatives to prevent illegal voting. He argues that it undermines federalism and states' rights, calling for true conservatives to oppose it.</p><p>Wolverton highlights that the legislation could paradoxically allow children of illegal aliens born in the U.S. to vote. #politics</p>

The SAVE Act? No So Fast, Constitutional Expert Explains

Loading...