00;00;00;00 - 00;00;33;10 Unknown Can you imagine how upside down this is, right? The only reason the Board of Elections exists is to serve the people in fulfilling the directive. That is the third sentence of the United States Constitution. When they said secure the blessing of liberty, they meant never again, right? Never again is an arbitrary and capricious magistrate allowed to interfere with my relationship directly to my creator, right? 00;00;33;13 - 00;01;06;23 Unknown Unless I have violated the social contract. If I have broken the law. Now, we're. Now. I'm the one who made that choice. But they're never allowed to break the contract. As Alexander Hamilton said in multiple Federalist papers, are actually titled you know how to Secure Transparency in Our government. They're never allowed to close off the books and lock up the information and tell us to take their word for it. 00;01;06;26 - 00;01;34;19 Unknown Hello, everyone. Rebecca Terrell with the New American Magazine and with me today in the spotlight is Miss Marly Hornick. You probably recognize her name because I have I have interviewed her before, and she is playing a very, very critical role in all of our lives, whether we know it or not. You know, everybody is excited about the election outcome in November and the new inauguration, and nobody's sitting here like she is saying, wait a minute, we have a really big problem on our hands. 00;01;34;19 - 00;01;54;21 Unknown The voter rolls in in all, probably all states, but definitely the ones that, she has uncovered, are very corrupt and we need to do something about it or, you know, we won't have free and fair elections in this country. Marlee, thank you so much for taking the time to be with me today. Thanks, Rebecca and I do. 00;01;54;23 - 00;02;25;00 Unknown I have to always just clarify, you know, I am just the spokesperson for what is a massive volunteer organization. We literally have thousands of people, in different positions, working on everything from graphic design to, over 700 or nearly 700 advocacy presentations to town boards and city councils across the country in the last year, as well as doing all the data analytics, I just get to be the one who comes on. 00;02;25;00 - 00;02;57;02 Unknown This shows. But this is a huge team, a very, very devoted Americans. And yes, we're determined to make sure that this problem gets solved all the way down to the root, not just kind of a superficial or political solution, but we really do need to fix our system or voting system from end to end in order to secure the third sentence of the United States Constitution, that we choose our representatives, and we can also choose them if we're dissatisfied with the laws they attempt to impose upon us. 00;02;57;04 - 00;03;19;07 Unknown Yeah, absolutely. I mean, and you're right. I mean, I know that one person alone could not have accomplished what you have accomplished, but you recently contacted me with some very exciting news that's not making any headlines. So let's talk about that. Absolutely. You'll have to specify which exciting news, because there's so many things happening with united sovereign Americans. 00;03;19;09 - 00;03;47;28 Unknown That's true actually. Well, you know, we can run the full gamut. But what I was specifically referring to is what's going on in New York with the attorney General's office and the state Board of Elections. Right. Well, that is a fascinating and extraordinary event. So, in addition to being the co-founder and CEO of United Sovereign Americans, I started my journey, as some of your listeners will remember, with New York Citizens Audit. 00;03;48;00 - 00;04;21;08 Unknown We started this research, this investigative process, and basically what makes this process unique is that we're the first organization in the country to measure the current election misconduct as it is defined in federal, criminal law. So it's not just about anomalies or irregularities. The law criminal law defines these these issues as intentional, malicious acts that should have been prevented. 00;04;21;10 - 00;04;49;20 Unknown And we can get into that. But so anyway, back to New York, you know, for four years, we had this ongoing battle with state government. They would issue proclamations and decrees from the New York State Board of Elections. You know, they literally had letters they sent. This is this is unconscionable, really. They sent letters to, for example, the the State Association of Sheriffs, the State Association of District Attorneys. 00;04;49;23 - 00;05;21;28 Unknown They sent letters to a town councils. They sent letters to every election official in the state of New York. They sent letters. There were seven of these letters, went out to different officials. Statewide representation represented agencies, the county government agencies. They they sent them letters telling them that New York citizens audit was, misinformation and disinformation and that we were either ignorant and, you know, troublesome or we were outright malicious and spreading lies. 00;05;22;00 - 00;05;45;28 Unknown And they sent this information to every representative who saw, in fact, what's that? Who signed those letters? The state Board of Elections and specifically the chief election official for the state of New York, at the time, and I believe continuing her name is, Kristen Stavisky. And there's another one now, Raymond Riley. I believe he's the other, chief election official. 00;05;46;01 - 00;06;17;27 Unknown But can you imagine how upside down this is, right? The only reason the Board of Elections exists is to serve the people in fulfilling the directive. That is the third sentence of the United States Constitution. The only reason those people are in that office getting that paycheck is to make sure that it is the people of the several states who choose their representatives, because you cannot secure the blessing of liberty. 00;06;18;03 - 00;06;45;08 Unknown But sometimes we just read these words right, and we think, oh, that sounds so nice, right? When they said secure the blessing of liberty, they meant never again, right? Never again is an arbitrary and capricious magistrate allowed to interfere with my relationship directly to my creator, right? Unless I have violated the social contract. If I have broken the law now, we're now. 00;06;45;08 - 00;07;13;04 Unknown I'm the one who made that choice. But they're never allowed to break the contract. So this is their job is to make sure that we choose our representatives. End of story. Period. And and as Alexander Hamilton said in multiple Federalist Papers are actually titled, you know, how to secure transparency in our government. But, you know, generally speaking, that's not the exact words, but they this is like 1788. 00;07;13;04 - 00;07;36;18 Unknown They were like, they're never allowed to close off the books and lock up the information and tell us to take their word for it. So here are these individuals. That's their job. We say, hey, you know what? We found some issues with the way you're fulfilling your job. We found these, you know, five at the time it was like, whatever, 5.8 million, registration records with material omissions and errors. 00;07;36;18 - 00;08;07;12 Unknown According to civil rights law from 1964. It's defined. This is fraud or you have to go fix it right A or B that means that it's negligence on the, well, massive. So it's not negligence. It's not. It's called criminal felony election fraud. Wow. Yes okay. Because because this is their only job and you cannot you see it's like you have to go always back back back, back, back to the rock. 00;08;07;15 - 00;08;34;06 Unknown Right. Rock says the way to secure the blessing of liberty may never, ever lose it again is to have a social contract. And there have to be legislators that define the boundary of that contract. That's called the law. And once something is law, we all agree we're going to follow it with if. But if we don't like the law at collectively, not personally. 00;08;34;07 - 00;09;09;23 Unknown Right. Then we should be able to remove those representatives and choose someone different. Right. So it's like you have to go back to the root. That's the only way to secure liberty. So when we go to the New York State Board of Elections and say, hey, you know, regarding the 2020 election, we found over a million, material errors and omissions in the count of the vote regarding the 2022 midterm, we found 745,000 material, meaning you can't proceed without solving this legal question. 00;09;09;25 - 00;09;38;24 Unknown There are 745,000 legal questions that went unanswered. And yet the election was certified. And they come back this way, they come back and they suppress that voice. They're interfering not only with your right to suffrage, but they're interfering with our opportunity. And our divinely is not divinely are our secured under this social contract, our right to engage with our representatives. 00;09;39;00 - 00;10;11;22 Unknown Right. It is unconscionable. It is so un-American. And so, of course, getting back to what you were bringing up, which is the news, which is after all of this and after, you know, that New York's attorney general, the infamous Letitia James, launched a criminal investigation of New York citizens audit that took over a year, cost New York citizens Audit roughly $75,000, and we lost 1500 volunteers in the process because they were intimidated, which is also a civil rights crime. 00;10;11;26 - 00;10;44;00 Unknown Right. Now all of a sudden we find out, hey, you know, it's confidential. They don't want anybody to know. But somebody sent me a screenshot of these texts. They're auditing the voter rolls. After all of that, they're auditing their voter rolls. They they agree and admit internally, that this might be worthy of review after all of that disgusting harm and damage to the contract with our government working now, they want to keep it quiet, but they're taking a look to see, hey, you know, did these people have a point? 00;10;44;02 - 00;11;06;05 Unknown Right. Okay. So there isn't this a little bit like the students checking their own papers? How do we know that they're going to give us an honest audit? Oh they're not. Oh, yeah. Because I audited myself the other day, Rebecca. And you owe me 100 bucks. The. That's what I'm worried about. It's exactly still interesting to know. It's it's not legit. 00;11;06;11 - 00;11;44;01 Unknown You can't audit yourself. That's totally not legit. Especially for the most critical. Really. You know, I think about these things I lay sometimes. I'm just. I'm just pondering the words and I really try to think them through. There is one person and for each state hall, the chief election official. Yeah. That means there's 50 Americans total who are engaged in the process of certifying, as a final act, the federal and state elections administered by the state. 00;11;44;08 - 00;12;16;14 Unknown Yeah. When they sign that certification record, which is a historical record, right. Regarding the choice of representatives, they with their signature. And this is really interesting because under settled precedent through the United States Supreme Court, not only are they signing this document officially, they are signing it personally. Oh, and they held accountable if their signature or their certification proves to be false. 00;12;16;16 - 00;12;41;11 Unknown And it doesn't matter if it if they knew it was false or not, because their job is to make sure that it's true before they certify. Because when they sign that document, the state government and the federal government both are considered legitimate republican forms of government. We think the president is the most person and most important person in the country. 00;12;41;11 - 00;13;04;06 Unknown We think the people in Congress are the most important people in the country. Those 50 Americans could be the most important government officials we appoint. And sometimes in some states we elect them, and in some states we appoint them or that's it. The executive appoints a medical in New York. The executive doesn't even appoint them literally. In New York, the parties appoint them. 00;13;04;06 - 00;13;31;03 Unknown Where in the Constitution does it say that political parties have the right to control the top bureau of election officials? It's insanity. That is insanity. Especially considering, I mean, back in the early days when the Founding Fathers still walked the earth, the Sedition Acts in the 1700s, you know, that's where the Federalists worked against the Democratic Republicans and, you know, jailed them, closed down newspapers. 00;13;31;03 - 00;13;52;18 Unknown We should we should know from our history lessons that, yeah, the party system is pretty, fraught with with problems. But absolutely, there's no mention of that in any any definitely wouldn't trust them with your representation because they are Partizan representation. We might live. We might have to live with them. You know, we might this might be the best way. 00;13;52;18 - 00;14;32;23 Unknown And I'm not saying that the parties have no value or no purpose, but that they should control the process of securing representation. That's really that's way out. Let's talk about, you know, sovereign Americans. Is that a Partizan group? No. Both organizations are strictly nonpartisan. What we're trying to do is secure that original promise, that original constitutional guarantee of being able to choose and therefore also being able to, choose representatives specifically and especially for U.S. Congress and having a guaranteed Republican form of government in every state. 00;14;32;26 - 00;15;10;21 Unknown And and that's not a state right. It's an individual right for each citizen who is a denizen of a state. Just to be clear. Right. So you have shared your screen with us here. And, go ahead and explain what what you want to show us here. Sure. So we were, you know what? One of the things that united sovereign Americans did because we did these comprehensive audits and it's such a unique process, again, because we measured defined election misconduct across 21 states using the federal record that the states must maintain. 00;15;10;21 - 00;15;35;16 Unknown That proves that what they did was a legitimate process. So when we just, you know, we did these 21 audits, we sent the information comprehensively to each of the state governments and the chief election official, the attorney general. And then we also sent reports to the FBI, the Department of Homeland Security and the Public Integrity office at the DOJ. 00;15;35;19 - 00;16;07;18 Unknown These reports didn't just contain, you know, numbers and, allegations. There was a hard drive associated with each one or a thumb drive that contained every single registration record individually that fell into the categories of our claims, asking for a line by line review of these problems. Because without a resolution, a legally valid resolution of those, problems, individually, we don't have any reason to trust election outcomes. 00;16;07;20 - 00;16;52;20 Unknown So after all of that, every single state wanted to basically dismiss the issues we raised. And that was very disheartening. Just to be clear, we all we want to do is solve these problems. And it was very disheartening that regardless of the political, you know, bent of this state or apparent political bent of the state, everybody wanted to kick this can down the road and get rid of united sovereign Americans, which is part of why it was so important, for example, that thousands of people across the country took these reports, took our resolution for a legally valid 2024 election, and went to their local officials, you know, almost 700 times across the United States of 00;16;52;20 - 00;17;13;11 Unknown America. It's like, look, try and get rid of us. No, we want our country. We want our country the way it was designed to function. And we will not go away until we get it. So one of the things that we did as united sovereign Americans and I think, you know, the last time we talked, we were just getting ready maybe to file this first, the first of our lawsuits. 00;17;13;14 - 00;17;41;16 Unknown We filed nine federal lawsuits. This is an unprecedented act by citizens in defense of the greatness of our country and the way it's supposed to operate. We're not a, you know, we're not some fancy advocacy organization or a think tank that's been around for 30 years. We raised half $1 million. We took our evidence and we took it to federal court in nine states, and we simply asked the court to enforce the law. 00;17;41;19 - 00;18;10;28 Unknown You just we didn't point any fingers. We didn't, play the blame game or anything like that. We just said, you know, judge, this is not acceptable. This is not the same thing as a valid process. How can we secure the law using a process that doesn't follow the law? It's innate. You can't do it right. That's like since Aristotle knew that you can't contradict yourself and like, you know, still have a valid circumstance. 00;18;10;28 - 00;18;37;11 Unknown So. So we filed these nine lawsuits and those are in process. Every single state filed to dismiss the evidence, while to dismiss the arguments not concerned with millions of material, errors and omissions in their records, not concerned with the third sentence of the Constitution or their fealty to federal law and federal standards of accuracy. For in the conduct of federal elections, no concern whatsoever. 00;18;37;11 - 00;19;05;23 Unknown Just get rid of these people. The United States Attorney general also filed to dismiss as a defendant in each one of those nine cases. And just to be clear, we talked about the guarantee clause. The United States Attorney general does not have a discretionary determination in terms of investigating these problems. If we bring and this is this is a logical thing, you have to really think it through because they'll tell you, oh, no, the law says it's not just the law says it's discretionary. 00;19;05;23 - 00;19;38;03 Unknown The Voting Rights Act says it's a discretionary. It's not because the United States Constitution says that the federal government guarantees each individual citizen, a Republican form of government. If we bring you, you know, tens of millions of material violations of law regarding that problem, they are compel to investigate. They are. And if they say they're not, they're just perpetuating a falsehood that is going to come back around worse the next time. 00;19;38;05 - 00;20;16;23 Unknown So so anyway, so in each case, the judge dismissed their motion to dismiss. Right. Denied. I should say no, actually, it's not settled yet. Not a single one has and not a single district has issued a decision. But I will say that what we have discovered is that the the organizations that are seeking to, debride the security of our election process on the basis of, allegations of disenfranchize has meant broad disenfranchisement of minorities, as if it was still 1964 are terrified of these lawsuits. 00;20;16;29 - 00;20;43;12 Unknown The Brennan Center, democracy docket and Marc Elias, the League of Women Voters and the NAACP have all filed motions in our lawsuits all over the country. They've been filing motions to try to get rid of this problem, called citizens, demanding that our contract with our government be upheld. Well, that and that's a broad spectrum. That's from both sides of the aisles. 00;20;43;14 - 00;21;09;29 Unknown It's just from that. It's, you know, every single person who's serving in office right now got there through this system. It's very hard. So say to sit down, you know, you got a cup of coffee or whatever it is that you would need to sober yourself up and say, this is no longer about me, and this is no longer about my ambitions and my personal journey. 00;21;10;02 - 00;21;31;28 Unknown Our country is on the line because what we've discovered. So let me just, let me go to a different slide. Let's go to a summary here. Okay. This is about it happening, by the way. What what are you expecting to happen? Do you expect the judges to dismiss those, to deny those motions, to dismiss? Well, that's a great question. 00;21;32;01 - 00;21;55;15 Unknown We kind of. We came up with this interesting idea as we type, because, you see, Rebecca, there's no point in doing all this work and sacrificing all these hours from our families. And the things that we would personally rather be pursuing right now. There's no point in in doing all of that and losing. Right? Right. That's just dumb. 00;21;55;18 - 00;22;15;11 Unknown So so that's not what United Sovereign Americans is about. Yeah. We're we're designing everything we do to win. And we have to sit and think it through. And so one of the things we thought through was how do we make sure, we get a fair ruling on this issue because it's a constitutional issue. It's an equity issue. 00;22;15;11 - 00;22;36;09 Unknown And the only court that can really deal with this properly is the United States Supreme Court. So we said, how do we guarantee we get in front of the United States Supreme Court to the best of our ability? And so what we did was we filed these across seven different federal court circuits. Okay. So we have to start at the district level. 00;22;36;11 - 00;23;17;14 Unknown So in nine states, we filed at the district level. But we expect that no matter what the outcome in those cases, they're all going to be appealed to the circuit level. Okay. And so now now we're at a different level of the federal court system. So, we we split these cases across seven different federal circuits. And the interesting thing about that is that when you have federal circuits who issue, rulings that that vary from one another on the exact same issue, you have a crisis, basically, because you don't have clarity about what the law is, right? 00;23;17;16 - 00;23;41;08 Unknown And how can everyone obey the law equally and be held accountable if the law is not clear? So what happens when you have a circuit disagreement on the same matter is the Supreme Court has to hear the case. They actually have to try the entire case. They don't just issue a ruling, they actually have to act like a, you know, a typical court would. 00;23;41;08 - 00;24;04;08 Unknown And this is rare for the Supreme Court to do. There are instances where it happens, sir, but they have to actually try the case from the beginning and they have to make a decision. And, it's the highest equity court in the land, meaning the highest court able to rule on a constitu tional right. It's abridgment. And what the proper resolution would be, in fairness. 00;24;04;11 - 00;24;35;07 Unknown So that's where those cases are hopefully destined to be adjudicated. Again, it's possible we don't break the circuit, but we deliberately and specifically chose courts that we thought would disagree. And we took advantage of some very slim chances left in the United States, where you can get a fair hearing from a specific judge who's known to have an originalist bent, who's known to be a good listener and really think things through deeply from a constitutional perspective. 00;24;35;07 - 00;24;57;18 Unknown And so we did file in front of one of those judges in Texas. Okay. And that that clearly is very concerning again, to these other organizations, because that's where a lot of their motions were filed to intervene. Okay. Sure. Yeah. But here's a slide. You know, basically a summary of what we found across the 21 states. 00;24;57;18 - 00;25;21;08 Unknown We found 29 million voters apparently registered to vote, but their voter registration records are materially deficient. So there's a control point. Yeah. You know, we have to think this through like the people, you know, everybody wants voter ID. I think voter ID is really, really important because it makes the job of the election official a lot easier. Sure. 00;25;21;08 - 00;25;50;29 Unknown But the job of the election officials still exists. And the issue that they have to resolve here is that 29 million times, somehow the control point wherein an applicant for voting is actually thoroughly verified and vetted as being a U.S. citizen qualified to vote, and a real person with a 29 million times it broke. So how is it that this is across how many states? 00;25;51;02 - 00;26;23;24 Unknown 21 states. Wow. So this is significant. This is a statistically significant number. This is massive and it's not statistically significant. It's fraud. Again, it's defined election misconduct. Well that's what I what I mean is you know the the narrative is well there wasn't any evidence of widespread or any widespread fraud. The they they'll admit, oh, there were little bitty instances of fraud, but nothing that would, you know, affect the outcome of the election. 00;26;23;24 - 00;26;47;08 Unknown So that's why I mentioned statistically significant. I know, but I get it. But we have to keep we have to retrain ourselves because this is 29 million times where there was a significant a material. They call it a material legal question, meaning you can't proceed right without solving this problem as a matter of law. And all parties involved signing off in agreement. 00;26;47;10 - 00;27;12;29 Unknown Yeah, 29 million times we have that issue and nobody did anything about it, and they just don't want to not do anything about it. Yes, we will go even one community. Let's take an example of how that actually lays out. So here's California in 2024. So we just finished this research. At the time there were election was administered and certified. 00;27;12;29 - 00;27;44;25 Unknown They had 9.5 million materially deficient individuals registered to vote in the state of California. And you can see some of the issues here. 3.5 million or 3.8 million of those records are backdated. So if you look at a copy of the rolls in 2022 and you look up, it's not general, it's specific. You look up this one voter, their name and their statewide identification number, and it says they're registered to vote in 2022 or 2019 or whatever. 00;27;44;25 - 00;28;10;10 Unknown Right. And you look them up in 2024 with the exact same specificity. Now it says they're they're registered to vote in 1984 3.8 million times. How does that happen? Well, why is the why are those dates being backdated? You got people registered to vote after having voted 3 million times in federal elections. This is a hot mess you even have in California. 00;28;10;10 - 00;28;29;10 Unknown They have this really special thing that I we haven't found this in any other state yet. I don't know, maybe we. Well, but you have it's called ID with no identity because there's no way to even you can't even explain this. You have a statewide identification number, right? There's no name, no address, no information, no birthdate, no registration date. 00;28;29;10 - 00;29;11;17 Unknown And they voted. Oh. Does that every single one of these is a legal question that has to be answered. And now we'll just go and we'll take that next step. I'm going to have to scroll through some of this stuff. That's fine. Take your time. That's great. 5,588,000 votes counted from these records. Now there is a way you can have if your record has been corrupted inside the system and you show up at the at the polls and you can prove your identity and you can fix the error there, you can have a provisional ballot. 00;29;11;19 - 00;29;31;04 Unknown That means that you you stand there in front of the election, you know, worker and you say, this is definitely me. This is the this is the deal, and here's my vote. But they can't count your vote equally. Right? Then, because there's an open legal question about the validity of your identity you had. So they take that ballot and they put it in a pile. 00;29;31;11 - 00;29;58;23 Unknown They set it aside to investigate and assure themselves it's correct, and everybody has to sign off on it. Nobody's allowed to do this in the dark. Nobody's allowed to adjudicate, legal questions in federal elections by themselves. But they didn't do that 5,588,000 times in California. This is just November, right? And everybody's sitting there across the country going, how come they're still counting the vote? 00;29;58;25 - 00;30;23;14 Unknown How come they haven't certified? They're 52 members of the United States House of Representatives yet. Well, and I'm just curious, these motions to dismiss, what possibly could anyone come up with as a reason to not want this exposed? Well, they they said, oh, it's a violation of the 11th Amendment because you're not allowed to sue a state. We're said we're not suing this state. 00;30;23;14 - 00;30;48;03 Unknown We're asking you, the chief election official, to follow the law. We're not suing the state. So it sounds like it's almost like, you know, then they said, well, you don't have standing because you haven't made a valid legal claim. It's like, I mean, you got to see because our attorney on those cases is Bruce Castor Jr, a great man who, he was the, a former attorney general of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. 00;30;48;05 - 00;31;07;26 Unknown He was the representative for president Donald Trump in the second impeachment trial in front of the U.S. Senate. Won that case, protected the president in that instance. And, you got to read his briefs. You can read them on our website, unite for freedom.com. If you go to the litigation page. Okay. You know, he just goes to town. 00;31;07;26 - 00;31;35;05 Unknown It's like, how can you possibly say that? We don't have a right to protect suffrage in federal court against a state official who is wildly out of compliance with federal law? How can that how can that be a legitimate grounds for dismissal? It's not. So again, have we gotten a decision yet? No, not one single court has issued a decision at the district level yet. 00;31;35;10 - 00;31;55;27 Unknown That is troubling. What how long do you think this has been going on? I think I think the do you believe this did not just start in 2020? No, of course not. And that's part of why our first lawsuits were just basically saying, how about we bring your system into compliance? You know, Florida, how about we bring your system into compliance? 00;31;55;27 - 00;32;18;28 Unknown Pennsylvania? Maryland? How about how about in Ohio? You know, how about it? Texas? Let's just get it right and and the response is very disheartening. So, you know, have people been cheating in elections since ancient Rome? Yeah, of course, because there's a lot of money and power at stake. Whoever gets to sit in those seats in U.S. Congress, they have. 00;32;18;28 - 00;32;39;23 Unknown It's like a remote control arm, right? They have this this mechanical arm, and it, like, comes right. It like, comes across and then the claw opens, right? And then it shifts downward like those, like at the arcade, you know, to pick up a fluffy, except that it's not going to get your kid a new stuffed animal. That's your bank account. 00;32;39;26 - 00;33;00;29 Unknown And whoever has the remote controls for this mechanical arm has the authority under the law to decide how far that mechanical arm goes down into your pile of your abundance and then grabs it, pulls it out, takes it away, and then Congress goes on a shopping spree. That's why we have to have valid elections. Okay, so it's so simple. 00;33;01;04 - 00;33;19;06 Unknown It is. It's very simple and straightforward. How much of this do you blame on the, automation of all of this? Where are you one of those who advocates for hand counting paper ballots. That's a really good question. Let's talk about that. I'm going to find another slide. Oh you know what. There's so many things to talk about. 00;33;19;06 - 00;33;32;19 Unknown And yeah there really are. And I want I want you if I don't ask you a question that you want me to ask you, I want you to just bring the subject up yourself. I just want to about this one for a minute, and then we'll get to that question, because it's a really important question. But I want to talk about one other study. 00;33;32;19 - 00;34;03;21 Unknown We did a couple of really forensic deep dive studies. And United Seven Americans is a highly credentialed data team. These are professionals, career professionals in, cyber security, information assurance, auditing, fraud controls and and big data software development. Okay, so these are not you know, when we do a study, we peer review everything we do. And our team has over 700 years of credentials combined. 00;34;03;21 - 00;34;31;23 Unknown So when we do a peer review this is a real thing. But one of the things that we did was we said okay, all these states filed to dismiss. So I, we said can we verify the identity of these voters. Can we figure out if these errors are material or not. And can we then supply the courts with a further piece of information that would help them determine, you know, how serious are these material omissions and errors? 00;34;31;25 - 00;34;59;02 Unknown Right. Never mind. Just that they're defined in the law. Never mind that it's a fundamental civil right. But let's see how serious they are. So we did this study. We we use the, you know, the federal method for scientific randomization of a study. We use the federal method for, statistical validity. In a prevalence study. And we hired through our attorneys, we hired a private investigative firm. 00;34;59;02 - 00;35;21;13 Unknown So we never touched any of the information directly. We're not trying to probe into anyone's life. We're just trying to understand it. Is this legitimate? Are these voters legit? Right. And we use the public information we didn't probe into any further evidence about who their identities, you know, what their identities could be, just the public information in the voter rolls. 00;35;21;15 - 00;35;45;28 Unknown And we asked three questions. We said, can we find this person in any of three different law enforcement databases, commercial tools that are used by law enforcement to find people specifically in space and time. So we say, can we find them in any of these three databases? We said, and can we find them associated with the address that they voted from at the time of the vote? 00;35;46;01 - 00;36;00;27 Unknown And we left a six month window on either side. So we said if they lived at the address for six months before or six months after, we're just going to call it a wash. We're going to ignore that question. Okay? Even though it's not, it's still a question. We're going to ignore it for the purposes of this study. 00;36;01;00 - 00;36;30;26 Unknown This is insane. In the 2022 midterm, which is the one we studied, California counted 11 million votes and we could not find they don't exist, 993,000 of those voters. They're fictitious as far as we can figure it out. You know, maybe there's 993 people living up on the side of some mountain in Marin County, you know, and they don't have a Social Security number. 00;36;30;26 - 00;37;13;22 Unknown They don't have a bank account. They gather water from their roof and they never, ever leave their property. Right. But it seems kind of unlikely. Yeah. Legal questions that would need to be resolved. So this is this is this is illegal voting, right? These are illegal ballots counted equally to qualified citizen voters in the state of California. And then another 2.25 million of them voted from addresses where the individual is simply not associated with the address during any kind of reasonable time frame at regarding the vote count, it's just they can't be found. 00;37;13;25 - 00;37;39;16 Unknown That's insane. It's election fraud. Okay, you got Pennsylvania 477,000 of the voters whose votes were counted don't exist. Now, I know a lot of people are kind of warming up to Fetterman. The people not too not too crazy about his wardrobe, but interested in his philosophy. Maybe. But that's when he was elected to the United States Senate. 00;37;39;22 - 00;38;03;21 Unknown Well, you know, and at that time, it was like out of left field, right. And again, like, I'm not saying that I know what the outcome of that election was, but the, the if this is the key, the officials in Pennsylvania, based on this chart right here, they have no idea no was elected and yet they took pen to paper. 00;38;03;24 - 00;38;28;21 Unknown Al Schmidt took pen to paper, Secretary of state, of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and said, this is absolutely accurate. I am guaranteeing the representatives from Pennsylvania who sit in in the United States Congress, and I am guaranteeing the state representatives that this is a Republican form of government to every citizen individually. I promise you, that's what just that's what we just did. 00;38;28;23 - 00;38;58;15 Unknown Wow. That's completely insane. Yep. 21.6% of the vote in California, Georgia, Illinois, Michigan, New York, Ohio and Pennsylvania is election fraud. Well, and to think that you I wouldn't be able to put my like John Hancock on that because that's your honor. You know. Yes. Aside from being legal. Right. And like you said, when did this start? Well, did Al Schmidt do all this? 00;38;58;15 - 00;39;26;16 Unknown No, no, but Al Schmidt isn't willing right now to humble himself before the United States Constitution and take this seriously and fix the problems and so on that basis, we have a serious, as my kids would say, beef without Schmidt, a real one, right? Because because he's supposed to be part of the process of securing the blessing of liberty for ourselves and our posterity. 00;39;26;19 - 00;39;48;20 Unknown And you cannot secure liberty, cannot secure the law with a process that doesn't follow the law. Right? You can't. How much of this was warned against in that nut Carter Baker commission? Wasn't that in the 90s or was in the 80s? It was the 80s and they had they did it. They did a whole, Jimmy Carter and what's his name? 00;39;48;20 - 00;40;13;08 Unknown Baker put together did a whole investigation on the way to ensure your election is is right. You know, I was correct. And, all of these things you can't have, you can't do Mail-In ballots, you can't do absentee ballots. You need hand counted paper ballots and all this stuff. Right? Seems like we're breaking all of those rules. Yeah, well, that is so that leads us to right back where you wanted to go. 00;40;13;08 - 00;40;33;11 Unknown So let's go there. This is a tough slide to read. Yeah, it's it's tiny but you don't really have to read it. What I'm going to do is kind of walk through okay. These election integrity solutions that are being blasted, you know, everybody says this is the solution. This is the solution. Voter ID, no mail in ballots. This is how we solve it. 00;40;33;14 - 00;41;03;22 Unknown Let's talk about how elections are a process. So when you have a process you have multiple steps. Just like, you know, when you were in, you know, in Algebra and Algebra one, and you learned that there's an order of operations to getting the right solution to a mathematical question? Sure. There is an order of operations to getting the right solution to a legal question of representation, legitimate representation. 00;41;03;24 - 00;41;33;10 Unknown So up here let's see. It's going to be a little funny right there. That thing that you can't read. Yes. It says the first thing that has to happen to have a legally valid election because elections are considered or the voting systems are considered critical national security infrastructure. You know, that means this set up is like a digital border for another country. 00;41;33;12 - 00;42;05;10 Unknown So we can't have 29 million infringements on that border. That is a that is a crisis in governance that requires swift and decisive investigation and possibly prosecution. So the first thing we have to do to have a legally valid election is we have to conform the voting system to the risk management framework that is basically part of federal law in securing critical infrastructure. 00;42;05;13 - 00;42;23;24 Unknown And so you'll see, it's really tiny. But you see there's like a little green arrow here. Okay. So you're going to go through a process. And if you succeed you keep going. And if you fail boom, you're out over here. There's this stop sign. It says you're toast. You can't use that system or you have to bring it into compliance and try again. 00;42;23;24 - 00;42;52;15 Unknown Right. You have to go back and work harder okay. Now and that's not a that's the this next management frame risk management framework from from the federal government is not a thing that you certify sign and then you're done. Right. This is a continual monitoring like process for for for potential new threats and risks. Right. So it's not what your staff publishing here at the beginning is basically that your entire voting system picture it. 00;42;52;15 - 00;43;12;22 Unknown It's on like a football field. You secure it, you know, you put it right in the middle so that there's all this empty space around it. You turn the floodlights on, and then you post guards that are monitoring every possible access point. Why? Because what criminal in their right mind would try to enter into that system? They just wouldn't do it because you're not going to get anywhere, right? 00;43;12;22 - 00;43;32;27 Unknown So that's the first step. And if you don't pass that step, you can't even register one voter right now. Let's say you get there. You train all your personnel in every single polling site in the United States of America, is staffed with individuals who understand risk management framework compliance for critical infrastructure. Right. Because that's just, you know, that's no biggie. 00;43;33;04 - 00;44;05;15 Unknown Let's just train however many people. That is insane. So now you're allowed to start registering voters. And here you can't read this word. It says verification. And so before you get to go green down into the voter roll, you have to be verified. If you don't check out, you get thrown out of the system. I just showed you 8.5 million times that fake people got registered to vote successfully and cast and count, and had their votes counted in federal elections for representatives in Congress. 00;44;05;18 - 00;44;27;21 Unknown Insanity. How did this process control break that? Many times. How is that possible? So now here we are. This is the voter roll. And you'll see right here there's this tiny little spot. If we have voter ID that's where it sits okay. That's where we do the voter ID that everybody wants to use to fix the system. I am a huge advocate for voter ID. 00;44;27;23 - 00;44;46;21 Unknown Sure it makes the job of the election officials so much easier because whether or not we asked for ID at the polls, the election officials still have to secure every ballot as legitimate. Okay, so why would we want to, you know, throw them under the bus and not give them the opportunity to verify identity in the easiest way possible? 00;44;46;21 - 00;45;07;02 Unknown But this is this is the point in the process that that would secure. Okay. So now you got, voting in person, you got absentee votes and you got mail in ballots. So again, let's kick Mail-In ballots out of the system. Let's just kick them out. That's a great idea. You're right that, you know, Carter was correct. It's a huge you leave the barn door open. 00;45;07;02 - 00;45;27;16 Unknown It's very difficult to deal with. But technically speaking, each one of those ballots comes down to this judging table. Right. And it's reviewed. And if it passes review, great. You go, you keep going down. If it fails review, you go over here, it becomes it needs to be adjudicated. If they can't decide it as a legal matter, it gets thrown out, right? 00;45;27;18 - 00;45;43;28 Unknown That's it. Right. You fail if it gets, you know, if they can figure it out. Now we're here. So here we are. Now we're into the machines. Okay? People who want to get rid of the machines. And they say that's going to fix the whole entire problem. That's right here. Right. So let's take out the machines. Did we solve the problem? 00;45;44;00 - 00;46;05;29 Unknown Some of it. So not the whole thing with K0 okay. Yeah. Tabulators can make errors. And if it makes you know if there's an error then that has to be adjudicated. Right. So you have to everybody has to gather around the old, tabulator error and review it together and sign off. Otherwise it gets thrown out. If it gets passed then it comes in to now we have the tallies. 00;46;05;29 - 00;46;32;26 Unknown Right. But if the tally is lack chain of custody, boom. Throw it out. It's garbage. The, if the error rate exceeds the federal standard, which is what the mandamus lawsuits are fundamentally about, you know, like, for example, New York's 2022 election was allowed 48 hour errors statewide under federal law when they just slightly exceeded that by about 745,000. 00;46;32;29 - 00;46;55;15 Unknown So you can't certify that that's a piece of garbage and it fails. It failed. That sometimes happens just like you said, like, whoo hoo! Let's kids, you know, grade their own papers, right? So now now you're allowed to start reporting. If you if you're still in the green, you're still flowing because you passed all those control points successfully. 00;46;55;18 - 00;47;21;08 Unknown Now, you can report to the media and everything over to the chief election official. This person, their job next, as we discussed before, is to make sure every single part of that process was legitimate. And if they feel that it was right and they feel that confidence, they can authorize the state and federal governments by certifying. And if they don't, they can throw it out. 00;47;21;10 - 00;47;53;02 Unknown Goodness, this is why you election integrity solutions, they don't understand. You have to take this entire system. You have to put it in a container, and you have to secure the container as if your liberty depended on it, because it does. Yeah, that is crazy. All those little parts and they just sign off on it. Well, and you know, one of the things so I want to talk about what United sovereign Americans is doing now to fix the problems. 00;47;53;04 - 00;48;12;04 Unknown Because, again, we're a completely volunteer organization. And, one of the things that I have to do right now is try to convince more people to join us, because this is about you. This is about your future and your liberty. Nobody's getting a paycheck at USA. Nobody's benefiting. Except that we're fixing this problem all the way down to the root. 00;48;12;06 - 00;48;37;28 Unknown So how are we fixing it? We have volunteers who do the audits. We have volunteers who take this information to all of their statewide officials this coming Tuesday, February 25th. I don't actually I don't know when this airs, but on February 25th, we have people all over the country taking the 2022 and 24 audits if we have them yet for their state to their state legislators. 00;48;38;00 - 00;49;09;10 Unknown And they're saying to those state legislators, we want two things. We want an immediate investigation. We want you to lead the way and sponsor a letter from the state legislature over to the attorney general saying this needs to be investigated and it needs to be investigated now. All right. And we also want you to review the United Sovereign Americans legislative solution, the draft legislation they have prepared for your review about how we actually secure the entire system. 00;49;09;13 - 00;49;40;29 Unknown And one of the things that's unique about our legislative solution is that we are going to be advocating, we are advocating for, instead of auditing down here to when everything has been completed already. Right? Audit the entire process as it's rolling, which is not a duty of an election official because they can't audit themselves. This is an external third party, bonded, certified, qualified, a indemnified auditing agency like those for example. 00;49;40;29 - 00;50;02;21 Unknown Sure, that would be able to on a lawful basis, review the process, make sure on a prevalence basis that it's accurate. And if it's not, instead of waiting until down here and having to stop the whole thing, we could just turn it hit one polling site. If we have problems there, just cut it off, sir, and keep the election rolling because we have to have continuity of governance. 00;50;02;21 - 00;50;24;23 Unknown I mean, they use that argument all the time. Well, if you question the outcome, then we don't have continuity of governance. Well, we don't have continuity of governance. We have continuity of fraud right now. So that ain't working either. So basically, you know, this is one of our upcoming initiatives again, on on Tuesday the 25th, people can still sign up on our website to participate. 00;50;24;25 - 00;50;56;23 Unknown There's great documents, these these kind of beautiful graphs and diagrams. Will you'll bring them to your legislators and say, see, right now, fix that exam. We also have a complete training conference in April, April 4th through seventh. We are hosting a comprehensive, training process in the United Sovereign American solution in the law, the Constitution, the the legislative solution, and the, the criminal solution. 00;50;56;23 - 00;51;14;18 Unknown The prosecution solution, and and the litigation solution. So you come to Saint Louis, we're going to be in Saint Louis. So we're trying to be like equal from everybody in the room. Come to Saint Louis April 4th through seventh. You'll have a great time. You'll meet amazing people from all over the country. Your your kin will be there. 00;51;14;20 - 00;51;36;04 Unknown You'll eat good food, will stay in the hotel, and we'll just spend the weekend getting 100% clear. Because you know what? If you don't understand what a legally valid election is and why it's important, okay, your election official will keep giving you a piece of buttered toast and telling you it's a steak. Yeah, and it's not. It's not a steak. 00;51;36;07 - 00;51;57;07 Unknown And, so we have to know. We have to know the difference. Because obviously, the people who are supposed to be doing this are they're getting cloudy about the purpose themselves. Right? They're getting a little funkier around the edges. We have to bring the whole thing back into compliance. So anyway, that's some of our activities. Yeah. We have the legislative proposal. 00;51;57;07 - 00;52;20;20 Unknown We are also working as hard as we can to get to the Department of Justice right now because these are measured, violations of criminal law. Yes. Especially when the officials who are in charge of these records refuse to investigate in good faith, right. They demonstrate their unwillingness to bring their system into compliance, which means they are now fully out of compliance. 00;52;20;20 - 00;52;45;21 Unknown And they have to be held accountable for that. So we're trying to get to the DOJ and work with the DOJ. We've been going to DC and meeting with representatives there. We've been meeting with senators and, and from the House as well, trying to get those same issues, get the letter signed from all over the federal government, get that passed over to Attorney General Bondy, and get them reviewing the legislative proposal. 00;52;45;23 - 00;53;16;19 Unknown And then finally, we are planning to file more lawsuits. The mandamus lawsuits continue and their process to get this adjudicated in front of the Supreme Court. But right now, we have recounts of Trent, betraying officials, disloyal officials all over the United States of America, signing off on elections that are materially invalid. They are legally invalid. And we have the opportunity and the right to hold them accountable for those acts under civil law without prosecutors. 00;53;16;22 - 00;53;33;04 Unknown And we are drafting those lawsuits now, I can't tell you where we're going to file them. I can't tell you everything in them. But that is a huge part of the USA solution. So I just want everybody to know that's what we're working on. You cannot lose when you come to be a part of united sovereign Americans, you will have the greatest time. 00;53;33;04 - 00;53;56;28 Unknown You will learn more than you ever thought about your country and how how beautiful it is, and you will be a part of the ultimate solution that once again secures the blessing of liberty for ourselves and our posterity, as our right, as our forefathers and our founders determined for us, we will continue that tradition. We will continue that beautiful promise of America. 00;53;57;00 - 00;54;26;25 Unknown And, if you can't participate, if you can't volunteer, please go to unite for freedom.com and donate the. In all of the litigation, all of those prevalence studies, hiring private investigators, that's all funded by you. We can't produce this evidence without your support. So please give generously. Give as if your grandchildren's liberty depended on it. And we will keep solving these problems and keep fighting this, for you on your behalf. 00;54;26;28 - 00;54;46;13 Unknown Yes, absolutely. I encourage everybody to visit the website, help out any way you can. And this is just is so impressive. It really is so impressive. But I do have to ask one thing. What kind of a reception are you getting on Capitol Hill when you go as it kind of a little, you know, grassroots lobbyist. It's been mixed race. 00;54;46;16 - 00;55;16;12 Unknown I think that, the, the what do they call it, the information warfare that we've been subjected to for nine years about that. There's never been election fraud there, never could be election fraud. Election fraud is a figment of crazy people's imaginations. It has made our, our lawmakers very, very wary, okay, of coming along in support of something. 00;55;16;12 - 00;55;57;21 Unknown Sure. One thing that's interesting that I've been able to share with them, though, often, you know, in 2017, President Trump, he authorized a presidential commission on election integrity. And the first thing that this commission sought to do was to get the voter rolls, the statewide voter registration lists from every state and and study them to find out what is the percentage of error in those lists, not only in terms of registration issues, but in terms of voter history, because the documents not only say who's registered, but they tell you when that person voted with it. 00;55;57;23 - 00;56;37;10 Unknown And, it doesn't tell you who they voted for. Of course, that's private, but it tells you when. And interestingly, the, you know, this became a political, like, Chernobyl, you know, it exploded in their faces and they were subjected to lawsuits arguing that this public data was not going to be turned over to the president's commission, to the executive agency was not going to be allowed to look at the state's official records that they keep on behalf of the federal government. 00;56;37;13 - 00;57;07;06 Unknown Ultimately, Kris Kobach, who was then secretary of state of Kansas, he was the chief election official. Now he's the attorney general of Kansas. He said, okay, fine. So they had to disband the whole commission. And he said, fine, I'm going to go over to the Department of Homeland Security, and I'm going to start using these lists to study them against the citizenship records that DHS has, just as a baseline measure of how many, not only non-citizens, but fictitious people because they're not citizens either. 00;57;07;06 - 00;57;29;24 Unknown Right? It's not that they're illegal aliens, it's that they don't even exist. And that got blocked also. So isn't it fascinating that here we are years later and citizens took up this project, you know, and we didn't even know at the time. We didn't even realize that we were taking up the project. We got the voter rolls. We did this study. 00;57;29;27 - 00;57;51;00 Unknown So in answer to your question on Capitol Hill, I think that has resonated really powerfully with a lot of representatives is that, you know, this isn't some like just fly by night operation, just doing a random study. This was what President Trump wanted. And he was so politically attacked that they were not able they only got one state to turn over the rolls. 00;57;51;02 - 00;58;09;27 Unknown Actually, all that is can, you know, you're over the target when you get that kind of backlash? Wow. This is just amazing. I am so I am so in awe of you and I everything that you've done and all your your team, your team of volunteers across the country, I do encourage everybody to visit your website, unite for freedom talk. 00;58;10;00 - 00;58;29;02 Unknown Com. Right. Yep. And it's right on the wall right behind you. And, I Godspeed. Thank you so much for your time today, Marlee. Well, thank you for giving us the opportunity to share all this, and I hope everybody comes and gets involved. I hope to meet everybody in Saint Louis in April. It's going to be a really important and powerful weekend. 00;58;29;02 - 01;00;37;14 Unknown So thank you so much, Rebecca. God bless you. You.