How will Congress react to a bill banning weather modification? Georgia’s Republican congresswoman, Marjorie Taylor Greene, announced she’s introducing such a proposal soon with a fellow Republican Southern lawmaker, Tennessee’s Tim Burchett, as a co-sponsor. While it’s sure to generate jeers of “conspiracy theories,” that will only indicate the ignorance some may harbor about a practice that is out in the open.
Greene tweeted Saturday that she aims to make it a felony offense for private or government entities to inject, release, or disperse anything into the atmosphere that would change the “weather, temperature, climate, or sunlight intensity.” She said the federal proposal will be similar to a Florida bill that was recently signed into law.
The existence of weather modification is fact, and so is the government’s participation in it. The U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) admits the government is involved in cloud seeding, although it claims that such participation is “minimal.” According to the GAO:
Cloud seeding is a decades-old approach to modifying weather that uses a range of supporting technologies for research and operations. According to NOAA [the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration], the most common uses of cloud seeding are to increase precipitation or suppress hail, usually by adding tiny particles of silver iodide. Nine U.S. states are currently using it, while ten have banned or have considered banning cloud seeding or weather modification in general. Federal cloud seeding involvement and support is minimal.
Not surprisingly, while downplaying the effect of cloud seeding, the GAO frames whatever impact it may have as beneficial:
Cloud seeding may increase water availability and result in economic, environmental, and human health benefits. In the studies GAO reviewed, estimates of the additional precipitation ranged from 0 to 20 percent. However, it is difficult to evaluate the effects of cloud seeding due to limitations of effectiveness research.
The GAO says that although cloud seeding technology has been around for 80 years, for some reason information on its impact is “unavailable” or “unreliable.” It further notes that people in general are ignorant about its impact. “The public may not fully understand cloud seeding, including how it differs from geoengineering, which affects the climate on longer time scales,” the government agency says.
There are several other examples corroborating the wide use of weather manipulation technology. For example, USAID (the United States Agency for International Development) was involved in a cloud-seeding program in Morocco from 1984 to 1989 — to the tune of $12 million.
The globalist organization Chatham House openly admits that weather manipulation technology is being used across the world:
Countries are increasingly using technology to change conditions in the atmosphere, oceans and ice to improve weather to their advantage or lessen global warming.
The group also acknowledges that such technology has been weaponized. One example of weather weaponization includes America’s Operation Popeye. That was
a classified cloud-seeding programme carried out by the US Air Force from 1967-1972 to extend the monsoon season in Vietnam and Laos so roads would be flooded, hampering Viet Cong military movements
The GAO’s sentiment that people are generally ignorant about the impact of weather manipulation is likely aimed at the “conspiracy theorists” who blame the recent spike in extreme weather events on cloud seeding and other forms of weather or light modification. Nevertheless, that was enough for the people of Florida to support the passage of Senate Bill 56, sponsored by GOP State Senator Ileana Garcia. The Florida lawmaker said she received complaints about “U.S. Air Force specialized artillery units using C-130 Hercules airplanes to spray chemicals.” Florida Governor Ron DeSantis, who signed the bill into law June 20, turned accusations of conspiracy theory on those committing acts of weather manipulation. “People got a lot of kooky ideas that they can get in and put things in the atmosphere to block the sun and save us from climate change,” he said. “We’re not playing that game in Florida.”
Many people in North Carolina who lived through the devastation of Hurricane Helene, which began in Florida, believe the storm behaved so oddly it had to have been manipulated. In states such as Missouri, Mississippi, Tennessee, Kentucky, and Indiana, citizens suspect weather manipulation is the culprit behind the region’s sudden and rapid increase of deadly tornadoes.
Geoengineering has been justified as a tool against supposed man-made climate change. But some people are beginning to suspect it’s causing more harm than good. Dane Wigington is one of those people. A researcher with a background in solar energy who runs the website GeoEngineering Watch, he is among the most outspoken and dedicated activists bringing attention to the practice of geoengineering and the harm it causes.
Wigington believes that “obvious ongoing operations in our skies” have tainted the skies, disrupted precipitation patterns, and caused a “toxic precipitation scenario.” He produced the documentary The Dimming, which makes the case that efforts to block out the sun are causing great harm, and has dedicated his life to bringing attention to this issue. Among those who agree with his mission is Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
Further, Wigington believes weather manipulation is the reason “weather extremes are becoming the new normal.” In a recent video, he implied that the catastrophic flood in Hill County, Texas, over the weekend is the result of “weather warfare” by controllers who “are now more desperate and dangerous than ever before.”