A succession battle for the throne of South Africa’s Zulu nation has reignited after a court ruled the president had unlawfully recognised the new king.
Misuzulu kaZwelithini was crowned king of the country’s richest and most powerful monarchy last year following an acrimonious legal battle with relatives.
At his coronation in front of thousands of leopard skin-clad warriors, he was recognised by Cyril Ramaphosa, the president of South Africa, and handed an official certificate which his supporters hoped would settle the tussle for the crown.
But a Pretoria high court has now ruled Mr Ramaphosa did not follow the proper procedures and should have first investigated family objections to the choice of new king.
Judge Norman Davis said the presidential recognition of the new king “was unlawful and invalid and the recognition decision is hereby set aside”.
Mr Ramaphosa was ordered to appoint a committee to investigate the disputes.
A family affair
The judge stressed his ruling was not meant to determine whether the king was the rightful heir, only whether government processes had been followed to grant recognition. Last year, a separate Pietermaritzburg court ruled King Misuzulu was the rightful monarch and the judge said that still stood.
However, supporters of the king’s rival, his brother Prince Simakade, quickly claimed the latest ruling was a victory in their struggle for the throne.
The new judgment is expected to trigger further legal challenges, including appeals, extending the rancour and deepening divisions in the royal household.
Prof Musa Xulu, a political and social commentator, said ultimately the Zulu royal family would have to get together to decide who was the proper king.
He told the Daily Maverick: “I have always pointed out that it looks like certain houses of the Zulu royal household were excluded from the nomination process that nominated Prince Misuzulu to the throne. So that is going to be a subject of investigation now.”