Despite predictions, a ceasefire in Gaza was not agreed while Benjamin Netanyahu, the Israeli prime minister, was in Washington. The reason is clear: Hamas is making demands that Israel cannot possibly accept. This from a terrorist organisation that has been ripped apart in 20 months of fighting, having recently witnessed its primary sponsor, Iran, humbled to the point
of impotence.
Yet Hamas still thinks it is Israel that must surrender. It’s like the Nazis calling on Eisenhower to pull back as the Allies crossed the Rhine in 1945. So what does Hamas want? The complete withdrawal of the IDF from Gaza and a guarantee that the war will permanently end, terms that have remained throughout the war.
Despite the extent to which Israel has written it down, Hamas still remains a dangerous terrorist organisation with thousands of armed killers on the books. Of course the IDF can’t withdraw in the face of that.
As for a complete end to the war, Netanyahu has said he is willing to begin negotiations for a permanent cessation immediately any ceasefire begins. His terms are that Hamas must disarm, Gaza must be demilitarised and Hamas can no longer maintain any governing or military capability. One option might be for the remaining Hamas terrorists to leave, even with their weapons, and I am sure arrangements for that have already been made should they agree to it.
If Netanyhu’s conditions are not achieved through negotiation – and what are the chances of that? – Israel will have to go straight back to the fight after any ceasefire. Some have suggested Trump would not allow that. But we heard the same thing during the last two Gaza ceasefires. Remember how the experts thought Trump would never permit Israel to attack Iran and certainly would not join in? The reality was that Netanyahu and Trump were in complete lockstep and I suspect the same is true now over Gaza.
Another of Hamas’s truculent demands is ending aid delivery by the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF), a US and Israel-backed organisation that has been distributing food directly to Gazans. They want all aid to be brought in by the UN and its affiliates.
Of course they do: they can sway and exploit the UN. They can’t control the GHF, which currently delivers the lion’s share of all aid, bypassing the terrorists. It is telling that the GHF is such a major issue for Hamas. That’s because it’s work has been helping to break their stranglehold over the population.
So what makes Hamas think it still has the muscle to dictate terms to the side that is so obviously winning the fight? It knows it is no longer popular among the citizens of Gaza. There have been some protests that were brutally smashed down.
During a recent visit to the Strip I met around 100 Gazan civilians. Many of them openly told me how much they hate Hamas and want rid of them. So strong was their feeling, cheered by those around them, that I believe it’s likely they are representative.
The dreadful truth is that Hamas gets greater encouragement to continue fighting from widespread support in the West and the misguided and unjust condemnation of Israel from many political leaders and international institutions. How often do we hear people such as Keir Starmer demanding Israel stops fighting yet never making any demand on Hamas?
The same is true of attitudes to the GHF. Starmer has also condemned them, as has the UN Secretary General, both speaking in unison with Hamas. And of course it is received wisdom in the West that the population must in no circumstances leave Gaza. Yet that would be the most humane option and should have happened long ago.
The majority of Gazans I spoke to said they want to leave as soon as possible. That’s hardly surprising given the misery, bloodshed and destruction brought on them by Hamas’s war. Acquiescing with their wishes is obvious. But many in the international community apparently would rather civilians be further endangered than voluntarily and temporarily evacuated. Again, they and Hamas almost speak with one voice.
Our leaders have helped to prolong the war and increase the killing. Instead of looking to reward terrorism by recognising a putative Palestinian state, Macron, Starmer and the rest should be helping to make Hamas give up hope and demand a ceasefire followed by a negotiated end to hostilities on Israel’s terms.
Despite predictions, a ceasefire in Gaza was not agreed while Benjamin Netanyahu, the Israeli prime minister, was in Washington. The reason is clear: Hamas is making demands that Israel cannot possibly accept. This from a terrorist organisation that has been ripped apart in 20 months of fighting, having recently witnessed its primary sponsor, Iran, humbled to the point
of impotence.
Yet Hamas still thinks it is Israel that must surrender. It’s like the Nazis calling on Eisenhower to pull back as the Allies crossed the Rhine in 1945. So what does Hamas want? The complete withdrawal of the IDF from Gaza and a guarantee that the war will permanently end, terms that have remained throughout the war.
Despite the extent to which Israel has written it down, Hamas still remains a dangerous terrorist organisation with thousands of armed killers on the books. Of course the IDF can’t withdraw in the face of that.
As for a complete end to the war, Netanyahu has said he is willing to begin negotiations for a permanent cessation immediately any ceasefire begins. His terms are that Hamas must disarm, Gaza must be demilitarised and Hamas can no longer maintain any governing or military capability. One option might be for the remaining Hamas terrorists to leave, even with their weapons, and I am sure arrangements for that have already been made should they agree to it.
If Netanyhu’s conditions are not achieved through negotiation – and what are the chances of that? – Israel will have to go straight back to the fight after any ceasefire. Some have suggested Trump would not allow that. But we heard the same thing during the last two Gaza ceasefires. Remember how the experts thought Trump would never permit Israel to attack Iran and certainly would not join in? The reality was that Netanyahu and Trump were in complete lockstep and I suspect the same is true now over Gaza.
Another of Hamas’s truculent demands is ending aid delivery by the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF), a US and Israel-backed organisation that has been distributing food directly to Gazans. They want all aid to be brought in by the UN and its affiliates.
Of course they do: they can sway and exploit the UN. They can’t control the GHF, which currently delivers the lion’s share of all aid, bypassing the terrorists. It is telling that the GHF is such a major issue for Hamas. That’s because it’s work has been helping to break their stranglehold over the population.
So what makes Hamas think it still has the muscle to dictate terms to the side that is so obviously winning the fight? It knows it is no longer popular among the citizens of Gaza. There have been some protests that were brutally smashed down.
During a recent visit to the Strip I met around 100 Gazan civilians. Many of them openly told me how much they hate Hamas and want rid of them. So strong was their feeling, cheered by those around them, that I believe it’s likely they are representative.
The dreadful truth is that Hamas gets greater encouragement to continue fighting from widespread support in the West and the misguided and unjust condemnation of Israel from many political leaders and international institutions. How often do we hear people such as Keir Starmer demanding Israel stops fighting yet never making any demand on Hamas?
The same is true of attitudes to the GHF. Starmer has also condemned them, as has the UN Secretary General, both speaking in unison with Hamas. And of course it is received wisdom in the West that the population must in no circumstances leave Gaza. Yet that would be the most humane option and should have happened long ago.
The majority of Gazans I spoke to said they want to leave as soon as possible. That’s hardly surprising given the misery, bloodshed and destruction brought on them by Hamas’s war. Acquiescing with their wishes is obvious. But many in the international community apparently would rather civilians be further endangered than voluntarily and temporarily evacuated. Again, they and Hamas almost speak with one voice.
Our leaders have helped to prolong the war and increase the killing. Instead of looking to reward terrorism by recognising a putative Palestinian state, Macron, Starmer and the rest should be helping to make Hamas give up hope and demand a ceasefire followed by a negotiated end to hostilities on Israel’s terms.