After dodging and weaving for 39 days as a presidential candidate, Kamala Harris finally submitted to an interview. It was a tactical error to have waited so long.
The pressure on the Democrat had only increased with each passing day. The stakes were high. In the end, Ms Harris, who likes to paint herself as a tough prosecutor, appeared unable to handle the scrutiny alone.
She tackled the interview the same way she has approached her entire campaign: a cautious, do-no-harm attitude. Sat next to her was her running mate Tim Walz – a visual crutch she could have done without.
It laid the ground for accusations that the televised interview on Left-leaning CNN was less of a grilling and more of a cosy chat.
Yet even questions that could easily have been anticipated were fumbled, including the opening: what would you do on day one in the White House?
Ms Harris still struggles to appear charismatic and communicate in concise soundbites that lend themselves to primetime TV - and viral online clips.
With that said, she was able to achieve some strategic goals. Her claim that her “values have not changed” was a smart play to progressives even as she runs from her one-time embrace of liberal policies.