The secretary general of Nato, Mark Rutte, has come to London as the head of the most powerful military alliance on the planet to remind us Brits that unless we re-invest in our military capabilities we had better start learning Russian.
Had we not achieved a similar feat after the “awakening” of 1940, we would now be talking German. The development of Hitler’s Nazi Germany in the 1930s is so frighteningly similar to Putin’s actions in the 2010s and 2020s as to make you think the same playbook is being followed.
Appearing to almost directly address Ms Reeves – ahead of her spending review on Wednesday – Rutte said: “If you do not go to the 5 per cent, including the 3.5 per cent for defence spending, you could still have the NHS … the pension system, but you better learn to speak Russian. That’s the consequence.”
Rutte means 3.5 per cent of GDP on defence – as opposed to Keir Starmer’s only concrete target of 2.5 per cent – plus another 1.5 per cent on security and infrastructure.
In some respects Rutte is wrong. There will be no welfare state and no NHS if Putin takes over. Just look at the fate of ordinary people in Russia who can barely afford to eat, and both inflation and interest rates north of 20 per cent and rising. That shows what life might be like under a modern Warsaw Pact.
Mr Rutte realises that we cannot appease tyrants like Putin and the only way to scare them off is to show strength.
“We are deadly serious that if anyone tries to attack us, the consequences of that attack would be devastating – be it Russia or anyone else,” he said.
We must not repeat the mistakes of our forebears in the 1930s, who failed to rearm to the level of deterrence. If we had realised that only total domination of Europe would satisfy Hitler, we would have confronted pressing demands at home for more welfare spending and avoided war – not by letting the aggressor have his way, as was famously attempted by Neville Chamberlain, but by being strong enough that Hitler would have avoided a confrontation.
As history recalls, when Chamberlain returned from Munich saying he had chosen “peace in our time”, Winston Churchill rebuked him:
“You were given a choice between war and dishonour. You chose dishonour, and you will have war.”
If we look realistically at what Putin has been telling us for the last 20 years we will understand that only the re-establishment of the old Soviet Union will satisfy him. The fact that none of those countries want to be part of Putin’s Russia, means only one thing, as we are sworn to defend them under Nato Article 5: war. If we abandon them, we will be dishonoured – and we will be next, facing an enlarged empire with even greater resources.
The Germans, realising belatedly the threat of another tyrant who wants to subjugate them, have issued a stark warning this week. Herr Bruno Kahl, head of the Federal Intelligence Service, said his agency had clear intelligence indications that Russian officials believed the collective defence obligations enshrined in the Nato treaty no longer had practical force.
“We are quite certain, and we have intelligence showing it, that Ukraine is only a step on the journey westward,” says Kahl.
Secretary General Rutte is spot on. This message from a former European liberal politician may get many backs up here, but we cannot ignore it. History tells us he’s right. Sadly we do not appear to have a Churchill among our modern day politicians to lead us through the coming confrontation with Putin.
I know from comments added to my previous pieces on this subject in this paper that there appear to be some who want us to capitulate and give up without a fight. Most of them are clearly Russian bots, part of the massive Russian propaganda machine who would want us to do exactly that. But if people think life in Britain is bad now, look east and see the misery most Russians live under. Let us heed Rutte’s warning, and in the immortal words of Donald Trump “build baby build” military capability.
Quite frankly if we fail to defend ourselves now, everything else vexing people at the moment will become horrifically irrelevant.
The secretary general of Nato, Mark Rutte, has come to London as the head of the most powerful military alliance on the planet to remind us Brits that unless we re-invest in our military capabilities we had better start learning Russian.
Had we not achieved a similar feat after the “awakening” of 1940, we would now be talking German. The development of Hitler’s Nazi Germany in the 1930s is so frighteningly similar to Putin’s actions in the 2010s and 2020s as to make you think the same playbook is being followed.
Appearing to almost directly address Ms Reeves – ahead of her spending review on Wednesday – Rutte said: “If you do not go to the 5 per cent, including the 3.5 per cent for defence spending, you could still have the NHS … the pension system, but you better learn to speak Russian. That’s the consequence.”
Rutte means 3.5 per cent of GDP on defence – as opposed to Keir Starmer’s only concrete target of 2.5 per cent – plus another 1.5 per cent on security and infrastructure.
In some respects Rutte is wrong. There will be no welfare state and no NHS if Putin takes over. Just look at the fate of ordinary people in Russia who can barely afford to eat, and both inflation and interest rates north of 20 per cent and rising. That shows what life might be like under a modern Warsaw Pact.
Mr Rutte realises that we cannot appease tyrants like Putin and the only way to scare them off is to show strength.
“We are deadly serious that if anyone tries to attack us, the consequences of that attack would be devastating – be it Russia or anyone else,” he said.
We must not repeat the mistakes of our forebears in the 1930s, who failed to rearm to the level of deterrence. If we had realised that only total domination of Europe would satisfy Hitler, we would have confronted pressing demands at home for more welfare spending and avoided war – not by letting the aggressor have his way, as was famously attempted by Neville Chamberlain, but by being strong enough that Hitler would have avoided a confrontation.
As history recalls, when Chamberlain returned from Munich saying he had chosen “peace in our time”, Winston Churchill rebuked him:
“You were given a choice between war and dishonour. You chose dishonour, and you will have war.”
If we look realistically at what Putin has been telling us for the last 20 years we will understand that only the re-establishment of the old Soviet Union will satisfy him. The fact that none of those countries want to be part of Putin’s Russia, means only one thing, as we are sworn to defend them under Nato Article 5: war. If we abandon them, we will be dishonoured – and we will be next, facing an enlarged empire with even greater resources.
The Germans, realising belatedly the threat of another tyrant who wants to subjugate them, have issued a stark warning this week. Herr Bruno Kahl, head of the Federal Intelligence Service, said his agency had clear intelligence indications that Russian officials believed the collective defence obligations enshrined in the Nato treaty no longer had practical force.
“We are quite certain, and we have intelligence showing it, that Ukraine is only a step on the journey westward,” says Kahl.
Secretary General Rutte is spot on. This message from a former European liberal politician may get many backs up here, but we cannot ignore it. History tells us he’s right. Sadly we do not appear to have a Churchill among our modern day politicians to lead us through the coming confrontation with Putin.
I know from comments added to my previous pieces on this subject in this paper that there appear to be some who want us to capitulate and give up without a fight. Most of them are clearly Russian bots, part of the massive Russian propaganda machine who would want us to do exactly that. But if people think life in Britain is bad now, look east and see the misery most Russians live under. Let us heed Rutte’s warning, and in the immortal words of Donald Trump “build baby build” military capability.
Quite frankly if we fail to defend ourselves now, everything else vexing people at the moment will become horrifically irrelevant.