Senate Republicans rolled out a suite of proposed changes to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) as a key component of President Trump’s “big beautiful bill” Wednesday — but it dials back some of the proposals sought by the House that drew intraparty concerns.
The new legislative text from the Senate would require states to cover some of the cost of SNAP benefits, which are currently completely funded by the federal government, if they have a payment error rate above 6 percent beginning in fiscal 2028, while allowing states with rates below that level to continue paying zero percent.
It also proposes states with higher payment error rates cover a greater share of benefit costs. If the error rate is 6 percent or higher, states would be subject to a sliding scale that could see their share of allotments rise to a range of between 5 percent to 15 percent.
The House, by contrast, called for all states to cover 5 percent of the cost of allotments in its agricultural proposal passed as part of a broader plan to advance Trump’s tax agenda last month, with states that had higher payment error rates having to pay anywhere between 15 percent to 25 percent.
The softened proposal comes as Senate Republicans expressed concerns about how the House pitch would have impacted states.
Democrats had also sharply criticized the House proposal, seizing on an analysis they requested from federal budget analysts on the potential effects of the plan that estimated about 1.3 million people could see their benefits reduced or eliminated in an average month between 2025 and 2034 under the pitch.
“This bill takes a commonsense approach to reforming SNAP-cutting waste, increasing state accountability, and helping recipients transition to self-sufficiency through work and training,” Senate Agriculture, Nutrition and Forestry Committee Chair John Boozman (R-Ariz.) said in a statement Wednesday. “It’s about being good stewards of taxpayer dollars while giving folks the tools to succeed.”
“At the same time, our farmers and ranchers are facing real challenges,” he said. “This legislation delivers the risk management tools and updated farm bill safety net they need to keep producing the safest, most abundant and affordable food, fuel, and fiber in the world. It’s an investment in rural America and the future of agriculture.”
Like the House bill, the Senate bill would also decrease the administrative cost the federal government is required to pay to help cover program operations in the states by 25 percent, but beginning in fiscal 2027.
The proposals in both chambers also seek to limit the federal government’s ability to increase monthly benefits in the future and include a chunk of farm provisions that GOP leaders have argued will make it easier to craft a bipartisan farm bill in the months ahead — although Democrats have said otherwise.
The Senate proposal seeks to narrow exceptions for work requirements for nondisabled adults, and calls for upping the age that nondisabled adults to “continue working through 64 and requires parents or guardians of children over the age of 10 to work,” a breakdown of the measure detailed.
But the legislation does not appear to include text seen in the House proposal that keeps intact exemptions for nondisabled adults without dependents for homeless people, veterans, and those up to 24 years of age that were in foster care.
The Hill has reached out to the Senate agricultural committee for more information.
Updated on June 12 at 8:16 a.m. EDT