THE AMERICA ONE NEWS
Jun 19, 2025  |  
0
 | Remer,MN
Sponsor:  QWIKET 
Sponsor:  QWIKET 
Sponsor:  QWIKET: Elevate your fantasy game! Interactive Sports Knowledge.
Sponsor:  QWIKET: Elevate your fantasy game! Interactive Sports Knowledge and Reasoning Support for Fantasy Sports and Betting Enthusiasts.
back  
topic
The Hill
The Hill
20 Dec 2024
Thomas Graham, opinion contributor  


NextImg:4 initial steps toward competitive coexistence with Russia 

With the possible exception of China, no issue will figure larger on the foreign-policy agenda of the incoming Trump administration than Russia.  

In the last three years, relations have plunged to depths of animosity not seen since the darkest days of the Cold War. Russia’s brutal aggression against Ukraine has rendered Russia and its president, Vladimir Putin, politically toxic in Washington. Episodic phone calls between senior officials to head off crises are no substitute for sustained, substantive dialogue between the world’s two leading nuclear powers.  

The restoration of more regular diplomatic relations is urgent. This is not a call for a reset, which is neither possible nor desirable: The clash of interests is too profound for it to be otherwise. The task, rather, is to transform a dangerous adversarial relationship into one of competitive coexistence, in which clashing geopolitical interests can be managed responsibly. Reaching that goal will require skill, tenacity, patience and resolve. 

To his credit, President-elect Trump has indicated that he wants to restore relations, at least to the point where it becomes possible to resolve the Russian-Ukrainian war in short order. He will find that the progress will not be quick, nor can his goal be reached unless it is embedded within a broader Russia agenda that includes such issues as strategic stability, European security, the Middle East, Northeast Asia, the Arctic and energy markets. The new administration will need a Russia policy, not just a Russian-Ukrainian war strategy.

That will take time. Trump should resist the temptation to have an early face-to-face meeting with Putin. The Russian ruler would welcome one as evidence that the Western effort to isolate him diplomatically has failed. Trump should want to get something in return for taking that step. It should come in the form of substantive summit outcomes that move relations forward while advancing American interests. That will not be possible without adequate preparation. At the same time, Trump also needs to indicate early on that he intends to restore regular dialogue. 

How then should the new administration proceed? 

Shortly after his inauguration, the new president should make a phone call to Putin to pass along two messages: First, that the U.S. does not seek Russia’s strategic defeat or regime change in Russia. Rather, the U.S. recognizes that Russia will remain a pillar of any future world order. For that reason, the two countries need to restore more normal diplomatic relations. And second, he must communicate that while a summit meeting is desirable, it should not take place until the two presidents can announce an agreed framework for managing relations and for resolving the Ukraine conflict.

With that in mind, he should send his special envoy for Russia and Ukraine, Keith Kellogg, to Moscow to begin preparations, including agreement on a summit date by summer 2025. On the proposed agenda should be the following: 

The two sides would then work on these issues to produce a substantive summit. 

Trump should meet with the key U.S. allies in advance of any meeting with Putin. Having the allies on board with a broad approach to Russia will enhance U.S. leverage in the run-up to a U.S.-Russian summit. 

Finally, the two presidents should meet. They should be able to announce frameworks for managing U.S.-Russian relations and resolving the Russian-Ukrainian war. Those frameworks would provide the meat of a joint statement; but, taking a page from the 1972 Shanghai communique, which laid the ground for the restoration of U.S. relations with China, the joint statement should lay out clearly the points of contention between the two sides. As with the earlier communique, a candid articulation of differences would lend greater credibility to the few agreed areas of cooperation. 

After the summit, a long road will lie ahead in building less perilous U.S.-Russian relations, but at least there will be a road. 

Thomas Graham, a distinguished fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations, was the senior director for Russia on the National Security Council staff during the George W. Bush administration. His new book, “Getting Russia Right,” is now available from Polity.