THE AMERICA ONE NEWS
Jun 4, 2025  |  
0
 | Remer,MN
Sponsor:  QWIKET 
Sponsor:  QWIKET 
Sponsor:  QWIKET: Elevate your fantasy game! Interactive Sports Knowledge.
Sponsor:  QWIKET: Elevate your fantasy game! Interactive Sports Knowledge and Reasoning Support for Fantasy Sports and Betting Enthusiasts.
back  
topic
Steve Straub


NextImg:Your Car Stores Your Text Messages And Police Can Retrieve Them Anytime, After Federally Rejected Lawsuit

In a recent legal decision that’s stirring debate, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit ruled that cars storing text and call information from cell phones don’t violate privacy laws.

This ruling is at the center of a significant legal battle and reflects wider concerns about the erosion of personal privacy in the digital age.

The lawsuit involved major car manufacturers like Ford, General Motors, Honda, Toyota, and Volkswagen.

The plaintiffs argued that these companies violated the Washington State Privacy Act by programming cars to automatically download and store all text messages and call logs from connected cell phones.

They claimed this happened without their knowledge, presenting a serious invasion of privacy.

Ford responded by saying that by connecting their phones to the cars, drivers were implicitly agreeing to this data collection.

They also pointed out that they don’t have access to the data and that there’s a way to wipe it clean from the vehicle’s memory.

However, the focus shifted when the court looked at Berla, a company that provides data retrieval technology to law enforcement.

Berla advertised that accessing data from a connected vehicle could be as revealing as having the actual phone.

Will you still text in your car?
Completing this poll entitles you to our news updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
You're logged in to Facebook. Click here to log out.
0% (0 Votes)
0% (0 Votes)

This raised significant concerns about the potential for law enforcement and others to access personal information without the owner’s explicit permission.

Despite these concerns, the court sided with the car manufacturers because the plaintiffs couldn’t show they were directly harmed by the alleged privacy breach, a requirement for receiving damages in such cases.

This legal decision doesn’t sit well with many who are worried about privacy.

A report by Mozilla News’ *Privacy Not Included team labeled modern vehicles as the “worst product category we have ever reviewed for privacy.”

Their research on 25 car brands showed that these companies collect more personal data than necessary.

The report revealed that cars could gather intimate details about individuals, such as medical information, sexual history, driving habits, and even make inferences about personal traits.

What’s more, it was found that 84 percent of the car brands they investigated shared or sold this data.

This revelation highlights a broader issue of how personal information is being used and distributed, raising significant concerns about privacy.

This case goes beyond the specifics of the lawsuit to underscore a larger issue: the growing gap between technological advancements and the protections for individual privacy.

As cars and other devices become more connected, they’re also collecting more data about us, often without clear consent or understanding from users.

This ruling has amplified calls for stricter regulations and better transparency about how personal data is used.

The ruling from the 9th Circuit is more than just a legal verdict; it’s a warning about the ongoing challenges to privacy in our increasingly digital world.

It signals the need for more action to protect individual privacy rights as technology continues to advance.

As we move forward, the balance between enjoying technological conveniences and protecting our personal information remains a critical issue that demands attention and action.