In a lively exchange on TalkTV’s “Piers Morgan Uncensored,” self-described socialist commentator and feminist author Grace Blakeley found herself in a heated discussion with conservative YouTuber and self-proclaimed “anti-feminist” Pearl Davis on the topic of equal pay in sports.

The debate was triggered by criticism from the Australian women’s soccer team regarding the pay gap for the FIFA World Cup, highlighting the disparity in prize money between men’s and women’s tournaments.

The total prize money for the 2023 Women’s World Cup amounts to $110 million, compared to $440 million offered to men’s teams at the 2022 World Cup.

Davis argued that rather than complaining about the pay gap, female athletes should express gratitude to the men who support their leagues, as these leagues might not exist without their funding.

Davis firmly asserted that pay should be based on revenue generation, stating, “When we have the same numbers, then we should get the same pay. I play volleyball at the highest level, and it’s like when we make what the men make and get the crowds that the men draw, then we should get paid the same.”

Blakeley countered by expressing her discontent with the current state of professional athletes’ salaries, believing they are excessive when compared to the average worker’s earnings.

However, this argument seemed to deviate from the discussion at hand, which centered on women’s sports and equal pay.

The debate continued with Davis questioning who should determine the appropriate pay scale, to which Blakeley responded that athletes’ salaries should be fair considering the struggles of the average worker.

Davis remained unyielding in her stance, emphasizing that women should not complain about pay discrepancies and instead focus on performance and merit to achieve equal pay.

As the discussion progressed, Davis drew attention to the perceived disparity in skill between male and female athletes, using the example of the U.S. Women’s National Team losing to a group of teenage boys.

This led Morgan to ask Blakeley directly whether women footballers should be paid the same as men, even if they do not generate equivalent revenue.

Blakeley ultimately conceded that there are inherent biological differences between male and female athletes, indicating that female athletes might not possess the same physical strength as their male counterparts.

Throughout the debate, Davis argued that pay should be based on performance, and she dismissed the idea of equity as a factor in determining salaries.

She cited examples of female-only industries where women outearn men, and pointed out that complaining tends to arise only when men dominate a particular field.

Despite Morgan’s reminder that unions already represent women’s sports, Blakeley maintained her call for more unions and demands for equal pay across various industries.

The debate concluded with Davis challenging Blakeley to name five female soccer players or WNBA players, to which Blakeley was unable to respond.

In summary, the discussion between Grace Blakeley and Pearl Davis revealed stark differences in their views on equal pay in sports.

While Blakeley advocated for equity and more unions, Davis emphasized performance-based pay and dismissed the notion of gender-based grievances.

The spirited exchange presented diverse perspectives on the topic, offering viewers insight into the ongoing debate over equal pay in the sports arena.

RELATED: Boxing Champ Doesn’t Mince Words, Calls It Like It Is on Transgenders in Sports