This week saw the student body of Boston University School of Law being offered emotional support services following the Supreme Court’s decisions on affirmative action, religious liberty, and student loan forgiveness.

Late Friday afternoon, the law school’s Student Government Association (SGA) distributed a statement critiquing the Supreme Court’s rulings in the cases of Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard, 303 Creative LLC. v. Elenis, and Biden v. Nebraska.

These cases, dealing with contentious topics, led to decisive outcomes that reverberated through the corridors of Boston University.

Fox News Digital obtained a leaked email where the SGA unabashedly criticized the Supreme Court’s decision in the Students for Fair Admissions case. This particular ruling determined that race-based affirmative action in college admissions is, indeed, unconstitutional.

The SGA stated, “[The assenting judges] went so far as to say that the race-based admission system uses race as a negative and operates it as a stereotype. They may couch their opinion in legal jargon, but we all know what this opinion aims to do: advocate for a ‘colorblind’ admission process.”

As a counter to this, they quoted Justice Sotomayor’s dissenting view: “ignoring race will not equalize a society that is racially unequal.”

RELATED: Harvard Reveals Work Around to Supreme Court Ruling: ‘We Will Certainly Comply’

In an absurd step, the students were reminded that the university has resources in case the SCOTUS decisions were just too much for the seemingly woke student population.

“As a reminder, BU also offers a number of wellness resources that are willing and able to help students navigate these times,” the memo said.

While the law school isn’t specifically providing specialized counseling, they did recommend existing resources for those students who felt they needed them.

Two of the resources named were BU Behavioral Medicine and BU Student Wellbeing. BU Behavioral Medicine, according to its website, offers therapy, on-call service for mental health emergencies, and mental health diagnoses, among other services.

The SGA continued to express dissatisfaction over the decision in 303 Creative LLC. v. Elenis, which upheld a Christian web designer’s right to refuse service to same-sex couples.

They also criticized the Biden v. Nebraska ruling that found President Biden’s proposed student loan forgiveness plan unconstitutional.

“These three decisions form part of a lengthy sequence of this court’s ruling which steadily erode the rights of marginalized communities and undermine the very diversity upon which our nation was built,” the memo said.

Boston University and BU Law SGA offered no immediate comment on these issues.

How will these students be prepared for the real world, both life and practicing law, if a differing judicial opinion warrants a need for therapy?

REALTED: AOC on a Rampage Against SCOTUS: Calls for Investigation and Even Impeachment