THE AMERICA ONE NEWS
Jun 21, 2025  |  
0
 | Remer,MN
Sponsor:  QWIKET 
Sponsor:  QWIKET 
Sponsor:  QWIKET: Elevate your fantasy game! Interactive Sports Knowledge.
Sponsor:  QWIKET: Elevate your fantasy game! Interactive Sports Knowledge and Reasoning Support for Fantasy Sports and Betting Enthusiasts.
back  
topic
Elizabeth Allen


NextImg:Senator J.D. Vance Takes a Stand Against Federal Mask Mandates with 'Freedom to Breathe Act'

In a climate where the reimplementation of mask mandates is gaining momentum, Senator J.D. Vance (R-Ohio) is taking a decisive stand by introducing legislation aimed at prohibiting federal mask mandates across various domains, including domestic air travel, public transit systems, and educational institutions at the primary, secondary, and post-secondary levels.

Sen. Vance is set to push forward his “Freedom to Breathe Act” for Senate floor consideration this Thursday, as per a press release from his office.

In his statement, he underlined the urgency of the situation: “Multiple entities within our government, within the public health bureaucracy, there are local schools in the D.C. area now reimposing mask mandates, this is coming back unless we stop it from happening.”

Loading a Tweet...

He emphasized his intent to hold the Democrats accountable, stating, “That’s why I introduced this legislation, and I’m going to force the Democrats to vote on it. If they say the mask mandates are not coming back, then come to the Senate floor, vote with us, and say ‘no more mask mandates.’ Let’s make it bipartisan.”

RELATED: Masks Are Back: US Sees Mild Rise in COVID-19 Cases Yet Mandates Are Back in Some Places Causing Outrage

Vance’s proposition rests on the argument that previous mask mandates failed to effectively curb the spread of respiratory viruses, encroached upon personal bodily freedom, and sowed division among fellow citizens.

The legislation, if passed, will remain in effect until December 31, 2024, with a key provision stating, “During the applicable period, notwithstanding any other provision of law, no Federal funds may be obligated or expended to propose, establish, implement, or enforce, directly or indirectly through the imposition of a condition on receipt of Federal funds, any requirement that an individual wear a mask or comply with a mask mandate while traveling as a passenger of an air carrier in the national airspace system, using public transit, or while in any elementary school, secondary school, or institution of higher education.”

Do you think a federal mask ban is a good idea?
Completing this poll entitles you to our news updates free of charge. You may opt out at anytime. You also agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
You're logged in to Facebook. Click here to log out.
0% (0 Votes)
0% (0 Votes)

Vance made his intentions clear on Fox News’s “Hannity” when he stated, “No more mask mandates for school kids or airline passengers. This week I’ll force a vote on my legislation to ban federal mask mandates.”

Loading a Tweet...

His resolute stance resonates with those who share concerns over the resurgence of mask mandates and their impact on health and personal liberties.

In this fervent debate over the role of mask mandates, Senator Vance’s proposal seeks to protect individual freedoms and curtail government overreach. It remains to be seen how this legislation will fare in a divided Senate.

RELATED: Biden Admin Rolling Out Pandemic 2.0 Preparations as CNN Barks ‘Break Out the Masks’