Raising more than a few eyebrows, a newly proposed Democratic bill, if enacted, would create an unprecedented requirement for California judges to consider a convicted criminal’s race during the sentencing process.
Despite a few quiet nods of approval within the Democratic party, a growing chorus of voices within the state expresses serious concerns about the implicit message this bill sends and the potential injustices it could instigate.
Spearheaded by Reggie Jones-Sawyer, the Democratic Chair of the Public Safety Committee in the California Assembly, Bill 852 was introduced in February and has since made its way through the Assembly with little fanfare.
Currently under scrutiny in the state Senate, the proposed law mandates judges to factor in the impacts of historical prejudice on different racial groups when determining prison sentences, sparking a hotbed of controversy and debate.
The bill aims to address an alleged racial bias within the criminal justice system.
However, many argue that justice should be blind to color and see each individual for their actions alone.
They contend that a person should be sentenced based on the crime committed, not their race.
The call for equal justice, unbiased by skin color or heritage, is a cornerstone of a fair legal system, they argue.
Critics suggest that Bill 852 would, paradoxically, introduce a form of state-sanctioned racial bias, eroding the fundamental principle of justice being served impartially and based on evidence, not ethnicity.
The bill draws upon findings from the California Task Force to Study and Develop Reparation Proposals for African Americans.
Formed in 2020 under Gov. Gavin Newsom’s administration, this task force was charged with exploring statewide reparations as a means to compensate for past slavery and racism.
The final report, a hefty 1,000-page document, provided several policy recommendations and calculated potential reparations, alleging lingering systemic racism due to historical injustices.
However, critics argue that such reparations are not only fiscally unrealistic given California’s current multi-billion-dollar deficit but also historically misaligned.
They point out that California, joining the Union in 1850, explicitly outlawed slavery from its inception, challenging the basis of such reparations.
Jones-Sawyer has yet to publicly comment on the contentious aspects of his legislation.
Meanwhile, critics contend that Bill 852, by focusing on race over crime, may be stepping away from true justice.
The debate rages on as the bill waits in the wings of the Senate, its future impact on California’s justice system uncertain and its fundamental premises controversial.
RELATED: Lawless Streets: New York City’s Crime Surge Forces Grocery Stores to Lock Up Ice Cream
