At the dawn of the upcoming academic year, the venerable halls of Harvard University will bear witness to an unprecedented event: an A.I. chatbot will be co-teaching a prominent coding class.
While this may be regarded as a testament to Harvard’s pioneering spirit, it also raises profound questions about the future of education.
The university’s decision, outlined by Professor David Malan, who will be responsible for overseeing the A.I. powered teaching, represents a marked departure from traditional teaching methods.
This foray into the realm of artificial intelligence in education may be indicative of Harvard’s commitment to staying abreast of technological advancements. Yet it simultaneously ushers us into largely uncharted territory, a domain that, while seemingly ripe with promise, is also riddled with potential pitfalls.
A word of caution comes from Martin Rand, co-founder and CEO of PactumAI, who stressed the inherent limitations of such an approach.
“I would say the dangers are that we have to consider that these are statistical models. These will come up with most probable answers and high probability can also mean mediocrity,” Rand warned.
“So professors need to be there to provide exceptionalism, and I think Harvard has taken the right approach in providing this only to introductory courses,” he said.
Despite this, Rand conceded that there may be some potential benefits, such as stimulating further innovation and education. Nonetheless, the overarching tone is one of skepticism.
According to the university’s student newspaper, The Harvard Crimson, Professor Malan has argued that the chatbot will offer diverse functions — from troubleshooting students’ coding errors to providing immediate feedback and answering their questions. This, according to Malan, aligns with the course’s tradition of continually introducing novel software into its syllabus.
However, the effectiveness of such tools remains to be seen. “Our own hope is that, through AI, we can eventually approximate a 1:1 teacher:student ratio for every student in CS50, as by providing them with software-based tools that, 24/7, can support their learning at a pace and in a style that works best for them individually,” Malan told The Crimson.
While Malan has reassured that the bot’s responses will be reviewed by human staff, critics argue this could be merely a veneer of control over a process that risks diminishing the role of human guidance in the learning process.
Concerns have also been raised about the potential over-reliance on A.I., which critics argue could make students less self-reliant and overly dependent on technology for solutions.
This echoes larger societal worries about the rapid and potentially unchecked advance of artificial intelligence in various spheres, with education being no exception.
In fact, students have reportedly been using A.I. tools like ChatGPT for school assignments, raising questions about the long-term effects on their learning and problem-solving skills.
As Harvard steps into this new world, it’s essential to question whether this integration of A.I. into teaching represents true progress, or if it’s a step too far, sacrificing the valuable human element in education.
RELATED: Criminals Exploit AI to Create Child Pornography, Blackmail Teens – Report
