In a move that could have far-reaching consequences, the California Senate recently passed a bill that would make it illegal for store employees to confront thieves.

SB 553, authored by Democrat Senator David Cortese from San Jose, has ignited a fierce debate on the future of shoplifting deterrence and public safety.

The bill requires employers to maintain violent incident logs, provide training for active shooter situations, and discard policies that compel workers to confront suspected shoplifters.

Senator Cortese claims that the bill aims to protect employees from harm while on the job.

However, critics argue that it goes too far and could actually encourage more theft.

The California Realtors Association (CRA) warns that if the bill passes, it will apply to all industries, not just retail, potentially enabling criminals to exploit businesses across the board.

Rachel Michelin, President, and CEO of the CRA, expressed her concerns, stating, “I think it will open the doors even wider for people to come in and steal from our stores.”

Opponents of the bill point out that many retailers already have policies in place that prohibit regular employees from directly addressing shoplifters.

Instead, specially trained staff handle such situations.

By preventing these trained professionals from doing their jobs, critics argue that the bill risks creating an environment that emboldens criminals.

Michelin further emphasized this point, asking, “What does that mean? We are opening up the door to allow people to walk into stores, steal, and walk out.”

The California Chamber of Commerce echoed these sentiments in a position letter, stating that SB 533 inappropriately applies regulations originally designed for hospitals related to workplace violence to all workplaces, regardless of their size or available resources.

The Chamber argues that the bill fails to address the reality of workplace violence, which is primarily a criminal matter that employers are ill-equipped to prevent.

The issue of shoplifting has escalated in recent years, costing retailers billions of dollars annually.

Major retailers like Target have been hit hard by theft and organized crime, with an estimated projected loss of $1.3 billion. The situation is dire in Downtown San Francisco, where Target employees have reported at least ten thefts per day.

The debate surrounding whether employees should confront shoplifters has intensified, particularly following a high-profile incident at a Walgreens store in downtown San Francisco.

A security guard fatally shot a suspected shoplifter, prompting discussions about appropriate measures for preventing theft.

San Francisco District Attorney Brooke Jenkins declined to charge the guard after reviewing surveillance footage and testimonies.

While the bill’s implications for security guards remain unclear, recent incidents, such as the tragic shooting of Home Depot employee Blake Mohs, have underscored the risks involved in confronting criminals. Mohs lost his life while attempting to stop an active robbery in Pleasanton, and it serves as a somber reminder of the dangers faced by those on the front lines of shoplifting deterrence.

If SB 553 becomes law, it could reshape the landscape of shoplifting prevention in California, potentially allowing shoplifters to walk away unchallenged.

The decision on whether to prioritize employee safety or deter theft is now in the hands of the state Assembly committees, as they review the bill’s provisions.

As California grapples with the increasing menace of shoplifting, the outcome of this debate will undoubtedly have wide-ranging implications for businesses and public safety.

RELATED: Immigrant Store Owner Says Crime in San Francisco Beyond Out of Control: ‘Worse than Afghanistan’