The escalating debate on gun rights vs gun control in the U.S. has taken a dramatic turn in New Mexico.
Governor Michelle Lujan Grisham’s recent declaration of a “gun violence public emergency” and the subsequent ban on the public carry of guns in Albuquerque has ignited a fierce legal challenge from gun rights advocates.
Governor’s Action: New Mexico Governor Michelle Lujan Grisham’s declaration of a “gun violence public emergency” and the subsequent ban on the public carry of guns in Albuquerque and its surrounding county have prompted legal challenges.
Legal Precedence: The National Association for Gun Rights (NAGR) cites the Supreme Court’s ruling in NYSRPA v. Bruen, where New York’s restrictions on the public carry of firearms were deemed unconstitutional. The assertion is that the governor’s actions are inconsistent with this Supreme Court ruling and, therefore, unconstitutional.
Argument on Executive Power: NAGR’s President Dudley Brown points to the potential misuse of emergency powers by executives to infringe upon constitutionally protected rights. This viewpoint suggests that using an “emergency” as a justification can lead to the erosion of fundamental rights.
Law Enforcement’s Stance: Sheriff John Allen’s statement highlights the tension that law enforcement might feel in situations like this. On the one hand, he expresses reservations about the executive order from a constitutional perspective. On the other, he acknowledges the need to address gun violence but is non-committal about the enforcement of the ban.
Public Reaction: The situation has polarized opinions, with some cheering NAGR’s legal challenge and others potentially supporting the governor’s move to address gun violence.
The unfolding events in New Mexico underscore a growing concern regarding the balance of executive power and constitutional rights.
Governor Michelle Lujan Grisham’s decision, given its apparent inconsistency with the recent Supreme Court ruling in NYSRPA v. Bruen, appears to be a blatant overstep of constitutional boundaries.
As defenders of the Constitution and believers in the established precedents set by the nation’s highest court, we ardently hope the judicial system will promptly address and rectify this concerning deviation, ensuring that individual rights are not compromised in the name of executive overreach.
RELATED: Study Reveals ‘Good Guys with Guns’ Are Very Effective in Stopping Active Shooter Situations
