CNN, the embattled network, finds itself in the midst of a high-stakes power struggle that could shape the very essence of its programming.

With the recent ousting of Chris Licht, the network’s semi-new boss, three prominent figures have seized the opportunity to assert their influence over CNN’s direction.

Anderson Cooper, Jake Tapper, and Erin Burnett have emerged as key players, determined to steer the network towards their preferred path.

This power struggle has become a pivotal moment that will ultimately determine whether CNN returns to its roots of fact-based reporting or further descends into the abyss of extreme partisanship.

Insiders paint a picture of an intense battle for control, with these three influential personalities taking the reins and exerting their authority over the network’s narrative.

Their united front, it seems, has resulted in a significant power shift within CNN.

The implications of this shift cannot be understated, as it raises critical questions about the future of CNN’s programming and its commitment to objective journalism.

Interestingly, conspicuously absent from this power grab is Kaitlan Collins, the network’s “it” girl, who was considered a protégé of Chris Licht.

Rumors suggest that Collins has fallen out of favor with her colleagues, and her exclusion from the new leadership alliance speaks volumes.

Collins recently faced criticism following her Town Hall with former President Donald Trump.

Many inside the network viewed the event as a blatant attempt to boost ratings, rather than a genuine effort to hold the ex-president accountable.

The departure of Chris Licht, preceded by a string of dismal ratings and a scathing exposé in The Atlantic, has left CNN in a state of disarray.

With Licht’s departure, a void has been left that urgently needs to be filled by a leader who can steer CNN back onto the path of responsible journalism.

Rumors swirling about a potential sale of CNN add another layer of uncertainty to the network’s future.

Former CEO Jeff Zucker, ousted due to a scandalous affair, may seek to take advantage of the situation by purchasing the network.

This potential move could have far-reaching consequences for CNN’s programming.

Will it become a vehicle for Zucker’s personal vendetta, amplifying his own biases and further polarizing its news coverage?

Such a scenario would be detrimental to the network’s remaining shred of credibility and the trust of its viewers.

The future of CNN hangs precariously in the balance.

Will the power struggle ultimately result in a return to fact-based reporting, prioritizing objectivity and journalistic integrity? Or will it push the network further into the realm of extreme partisanship, forsaking impartiality in favor of catering to a particular ideological base?

RELATED: CNN Set to Make Desperate Move as Viewership Plunges: Report