A recent ‘climate change’ study from the U.K. highlights the extent to which the climate change narrative can sometimes veer into the absurd.

Researchers from the clown college Centre for Ecology and Hydrology in Edinburgh have identified human breathing as a minor but noteworthy contributor to global warming.

The study reveals that methane and nitrous oxide emissions from human breathing account for about 0.1% of the nation’s greenhouse gas emissions, a figure that rises when considering emissions from other natural human processes.

This study could be seen as yet another example of the overreach of the climate change ‘religion.’

The researchers’ focus on the minutiae of human emissions, particularly from breathing, may reflect an underlying intent to influence personal behaviors, notably diet.

The speculation here is that the study might have been aiming to demonstrate a greater environmental impact from meat consumption, feeding into the broader narrative promoted by some in the climate change movement to reduce meat intake as part of environmental conservation.

However, the study’s findings did not support such a narrative.

It found negligible differences in the emissions between vegetarians and meat consumers, essentially nullifying the argument that diet changes could significantly impact individual contributions to greenhouse gas emissions in the UK.

This ‘outcome’ could be seen as a setback for those who might have hoped to use such data to advocate for a reduction in meat consumption as a climate change control mitigation strategy.

In essence, this study is just another example of the excessive fanaticism in the climate change ‘religion’ where even the most fundamental human activities are scrutinized for their environmental impact.

So, go ahead and ignore this study, breathe all you want and while you’re at it throw a steak or two on the grill, while you still can.

RELATED: UN Climate Summit Set to Call on the USA to Reduce It’s Meat Consumption, Overlooks Key Facts