It seems that San Francisco’s leadership has finally come to terms with a reality that many have long recognized: tough on crime policies work.

A recent report by the San Francisco Chronicle highlights a dramatic drop in car burglary rates following an aggressive crackdown.

Isn’t it peculiar how, with an election looming and the Governor eyeing a presidential bid in 2024, city leaders suddenly find the will to enforce law and order?

For too long, San Francisco, like many other Democrat-led cities, has been marred by rising crime rates, with leaders often appearing hesitant to adopt stringent law enforcement measures.

The city, which was experiencing rampant car burglaries, seemed to be on a downward spiral.

But lo and behold, as soon as a combination of bait cars, plainclothes officers, and video surveillance was implemented, the city witnessed a sharp decline in these crimes.

Between September 1 and November 26, car burglaries nearly halved compared to the same period in 2022.

It’s almost comical how District Attorney Brooke Jenkins and Mayor London Breed are now championing these policies after their “defund” anti-police rhetoric.

Jenkins talks about a “three-pronged strategy” involving targeted police efforts, vigorous prosecutions, and hard-line messaging.

Mayor Breed echoes these sentiments, emphasizing the city’s newfound resolve to arrest and prosecute car burglars.

It’s as if the city’s leaders have suddenly discovered the effectiveness of traditional law enforcement strategies that Republicans have long advocated for.

Police Lt. Scott Ryan’s observation that a small number of criminals commit the majority of these crimes, and the subsequent focus on apprehending these key players, is another testament to the efficacy of focused law enforcement.

This approach is not revolutionary; it’s basic crime-fighting 101.

Yet, it took a crisis of public confidence and political pressure for San Francisco’s leaders to adopt it.

The underlying irony is hard to miss.

These same leaders, who for years have been reluctant to enforce strict law and order, are now patting themselves on the back for implementing strategies that have long been common sense in other parts of the country.

It’s as if they expect applause for finally doing their job.

This shift in policy also coincides with the political aspirations of California’s Governor, who is rumored to be considering a run for the presidency in 2024.

Could it be that the sudden zeal for law and order is partly fueled by political ambitions? It wouldn’t be the first time that political expediency has driven policy decisions.

In conclusion, the sudden drop in crime in San Francisco following the implementation of tougher law enforcement measures is a clear vindication of policies long championed by Republicans.

It is a case study in the necessity of strong, decisive action to combat crime – a lesson that should not be forgotten or ignored.

The timing of this shift, conveniently aligning with the political calendar, is something the public should critically assess.

It’s high time that city leaders across the nation take note and act with the same resolve to ensure the safety and security of their residents, not just when it’s politically convenient, but always.