The Senate Foreign Relations Committee on March 8 voted to repeal the Authorizations for Use of Military Force (AUMF) in Iraq, as the 20th anniversary of the March 19, 2003, invasion approaches.
Both the 2002 and 1991 AUMFs were advanced in the committee by a vote of 13–8. The full Senate could vote on the legislation in the next few weeks.
The 2002 AUMF allowed the U.S. military to go into Iraq following reports that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction. The United States captured him in 2003 and he was executed by Iraq in 2006. The 1991 AUMF allowed U.S. forces to enter the Gulf War, where Hussein’s forces were driven out of Kuwait.
The committee’s chairman, Sen. Bob Menendez (D-N.Y.), celebrated the vote.
“AUMFs are the most solemn responsibility of this Committee, and our duty is not just to pass them, but to exercise vigilance as to how they are used and assess when it is time to declare them obsolete,” he said in a statement.
“Today’s vote asserts the congressional prerogative to determine how administrations—current and future ones—justify the use of military force,” he continued. “These two AUMFs are outdated, do not address current threats to U.S. interests, and should not be used to justify large-scale use of military force. Their repeal is in the U.S. national interest, and in the interest of our strategic partnership with Iraq and the region.”
Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) celebrated the advancement of the bill.
“This Senate Foreign Relations Committee has reached an agreement to move forward on the repeal of the Iraq AUMF. We need to put the Iraq war behind us once and for all. And doing that means we should repeal the legal authority that initiated the war to begin with,” Schumer posted on Twitter. He voted for the 2002 AUMF and against the 1991 AUMF.
The committee vote to repeal the AUMFs comes as the House of Representatives is set to vote on March 8 a resolution to withdraw all U.S. forces from Syria. U.S. troops are in Syria primarily to combat the Islamic State.
Additionally, the committee finally voted to advance Eric Garcetti’s nomination to be U.S. ambassador to India—449 days after the former Los Angeles mayor appeared before the committee and more than 600 days since he was nominated. Garcetti’s nomination has been in limbo due to allegations he knew, but prevented to stop, a senior staffer’s sexual misconduct from his time as mayor. The tally was 13–8. Sens. Todd Young (R-Ind.) and Bill Hagerty (R-Tenn.) voted with the committee’s 11 Democrats.
Despite Hagerty and Young joining in support, whether Garcetti can garner enough support in the full Senate, which the Democrats control 51–49.
The Epoch Times reached out to Hagerty and Young’s office to ask why they voted to advance Garcetti’s nomination.