After nearly five months of hearings, the House Armed Forces Committee’s six subcommittees on June 13 quickly and unanimously adopted their components of the proposed $874.2 billion fiscal year 2024 (FY24) national defense budget.
The next stop for the draft National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), filed as House Bill 2670, is its first hearing before the entire 59-member House Armed Services Committee on June 21. From there, it moves on to the Senate for adoption before FY24 begins on Oct. 1.
The overall $874.2 billion budget includes $841.5 billion for the Department of Defense (DOD), an increase of nearly $26 billion, or 3 percent, over the FY23 enacted NDAA, and $32.26 billion for the Department of Energy’s (DOE) nuclear weapons programs.
The Republican-led House panels essentially retained the Biden administration’s overall budget request but shifted money around within the spending plan, adding $326 million to DOD programs while trimming $386 million from DOE allocations to arrive at nearly the same top-line figure.
While that may sound relatively simple, there are many details within the details of the exhaustingly detailed line-by-line funding tables that span dozens of pages at the end of the 412-page draft NDAA.
“It is only because of the unimaginable sacrifices made by our nation’s brave men and women in uniform that our nation remains free—it’s crucial that we ensure that our service members have access to the resources and weapons they need to be successful on any battlefield,” House Armed Services Committee Chair Mike Rogers (R-Ala.) in a June 12 statement.
Among highlights within the spending plan is an amphibious warship the Marine Corps lobbied for but the Navy did not request, authorization to build 13 Virginia class attack submarines over the next five years instead of the proposed 10, boosted funding for Air Force F-15 and F-16s, and a 5.2-percent pay raise for those serving in the armed services.
“The FY24 NDAA puts our national security first by boosting innovation, providing for our warfighters, and focusing on our defense industrial base–supplying our military with the tools necessary to counter the unprecedented threats our nation faces from China, Russia, North Korea, and Iran,” Rogers said.
The proposed budget also significantly increases funding for research and development of new weapons systems incorporating artificial intelligence, hypersonic missiles, and other emerging technologies while bolstering funding for military housing, among other quality-of-life enhancements.
“Providing for our national defense is the most important task given to Congress by the U.S. Constitution–the NDAA is a critical part of fulfilling that duty,” Rodgers said. “I look forward to next week’s full committee markup.”
The U.S. Navy, in collaboration with the U.S. Army, conducts a static fire test of the first stage of the newly developed 34.5″ common hypersonic missile that will be fielded by both services, in Promontory, Utah, on Oct. 28, 2021. (Northrop Grumman/Handout via Reuters)During the committee’s Strategic Forces Subcommittee hearing, chair Rep. Doug Lamborn (R-Colo.) said the panel’s proposed spending plan “first and foremost modernizes the nation’s strategic deterrent” and seeks to accelerate the development offensive hypersonic weapons as well as in defending against them.
“This is one area where the United States lags behind China and Russia, and closing the gap has been one of my priorities as chairman,” he said.
To do so, “we must expand our test infrastructure and add additional range space” for developing the weapons systems,” Lamborn said.
The subcommittee’s proposed budget includes “an integrated schedule” for the LGM-35 Sentinel, the future U.S. land-based intercontinental ballistic missile system (ICBM) and requires DOD to notify Congress about nuclear cooperation between Russia and China.
“This subcommittee has paid a key role in highlighting the way Russia fuels China’s nuclear breakout, and this is something we will continue to closely monitor,” Lamborn said.
Ranking member, or the panel’s lead Democrat, Rep. Seth Moulton (D-Mass.), said the Strategic Forces Committee’s realm of concern “is front and center” in the news “whether it be the criminal war being waged by war criminal Vladimir Putin [and his] threats to wage a nuclear war, North Korea’s ICBM test launches, or the dramatic and unprecedented expansion of China’s ICBM fleet, not to mention their weaponization of space.”
The nation’s nuclear deterrent remains as vital, and as critical, as ever, he said. “One example of proof is the fact that over a year into the war in Ukraine, despite Putin’s huge losses and persistent threats, the conflict has remained conventional.”
But there is “aging infrastructure and weapons systems across the nuclear complex” that the proposed budget addresses, Moulton said.
“The space domain is evolving at a much faster pace” than any other theater of operation, he said. “Space had been a domain reserved for monitoring, communicating, and exploring, but no more. In just the last several months, we have seen demonstrations of both Russian and Chinese capacities that are specifically designed and deployed to destroy [United States] space assets.”
The United States must “employ a more robust and resilient architecture,” Moulton said, adding the nation “needs a coherent and unclassified strategy when it comes to space in order to explain the threats and stakes to the American people, which has long been a position of this committee and Congress.”
The U.S. Army’s Cyber Center of Excellence, in Augusta, Ga., on June 10. (Georgia Army National Guard photo by Staff Sgt. Tracy J. Smith)The House Armed Forces Committee’s Cyber, Information Technologies, and Innovation Subcommittee wasted little time—less than three minutes—in adopting its component of the budget.
The plan creates a pilot program on near-term quantum applications, which requires the DOD to work with “the quantum industry to identify near-term problems that could be solved with quantum computing” and includes metrics to evaluate the Pentagon’s “ability to transition technology successfully.”
The subcommittee’s proposed budget addresses cybersecurity, network security, and requires DOD to study how to better use National Guard and Reserve forces in cyberspace activities.
“In this strategic competition with the Chinese Communist Party, they are of the opinion that they can beat us,” Chair Rep. Mike Gallagher (R-Wisc.) said. “It is up to us to prove them wrong.”
Among highlights in the committee’s Military Personnel Subcommittee’s proposed spending plan is the 5.2-percent increase in basic military pay, a monthly “economic conditions bonus” for junior enlisted, the elimination of the 5-percent co-pay for housing, and the removal of the Basic Allowance for Housing from members’ calculation of basic needs allowances.
Chairman Rep. Jim Banks (R-Ind.) said there was no way the panel could move through its proposed budget in less than three minutes, the way the Cyber, Information Technologies, and Innovation Subcommittee did.
“I want to state for the record that it is impossible for the committee to do anything [that quickly] because of the substance of the nature of what we are going to accomplish in this subcommittee,” he said.
The panel’s mission “focuses on taking care of service members and their families to ensure they are prepared to carry out, without any distraction, any mission they are called upon to execute. The [budget proposal] builds on our continuous efforts to develop legislation that improves the lives of our military families,” Banks said.
The proposal authorizes the establishment of a Space National Guard and dramatically increases emphasis on childcare funding, he said.
“We’re not about setting speed records. We’re about getting things done,” Banks said.
The Times Square military recruiting station displays insignia for each military branch in Manhattan, New York City. (AP Photo/Bebeto Matthews, File)Ranking Member Rep. Andy Kim (D-NJ) said the budget addresses many quality-of-life issues for military members and their families” and “will have measurable impact on recruitment and retention.”
Only the Marine Corps and newly created Space Force met recruiting goals in 2022, while the three largest United States military branches fell short or marginally attained reconfigured goals.
The U.S. Army missed its 2022 recruiting goal by 15,000 active-duty soldiers, or 25 percent of its target, leaving the nation’s largest military force seven percent smaller than it was two years ago.
The Navy also fell shy even after lowering its recruiting quota, increasing its oldest enlistment age to 41 from 39, and relaxing other standards, including for those with criminal backgrounds.
The Air Force met 2022 goals but anticipates missing its objectives for the first time since 1999 by as much as 10 percent in 2023.
The Pentagon projects that trend will continue in 2023 in what it calls the “most challenging recruiting environment in the 50 years of the all-volunteer force,” primarily because of a strong job market and quality-of-life issues.
The Army estimates that in 2023 it will fall at least 20,000 soldiers short of its needed 485,000 active-duty force. It has lowered its goal to 452,000.
Even military academies are seeing shortfalls. Applications to attend the Air Force Academy dropped by 28 percent for the class of 2026, the Naval Academy by 20 percent, and West Point by 10 percent.