House Republicans on July 14 advanced a bill that would slash $1 billion from the budget of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) over previous levels amid ongoing concerns with the agency’s conduct.

The appropriations bill, which was passed through the House Committee on Commerce, Justice, Science, and Related Agencies in a party-line vote, would reduce the agency’s funding from the $11.3 billion it received this financial year to $10.3 billion (pdf). The reduction would return the agency’s funding to roughly 2022 levels.

The roughly 9 percent cut comprises a $400 million salary cut for the FBI over previous levels.

It comes amid a series of frustrations with the agency, which Republican lawmakers say has been weaponized against conservatives as they seek to address several key concerns.

The bill prohibits the FBI and others from using funding to “conduct any diversity, equity, inclusion, or explicit bias training.”

That provision comes after Republicans in the House passed a similar amendment to the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), barring the Department of Defense from promoting similar concepts.

It would also prevent the agency from using taxpayer funds to pay the salaries of those within the Department of Justice (DOJ) who engage in retaliatory conduct against a whistleblower.

“None of the funds made available by this Act may be used to pay the salary, benefits, bonuses, or expenses of a Department of Justice employee who is found to have retaliated against a whistleblower or suppressed an employee’s constitutional rights under the First Amendment,” the bill reads.

Agency whistleblowers have said that the agency has become “enveloped in politicization.” Many have reported incidents of retaliation for them speaking to Congress about these issues—despite longstanding congressional protections for executive branch whistleblowers.

Rep. Kat Cammack (R-Fla.) confirmed that Republicans had uncovered a “pattern” of such behavior.

In the most shocking of these cases, that of Special Agent Garret O’Boyle, a whistleblower was moved across the country by the FBI. When O’Boyle and his family arrived in Virginia, Mr. O’Boyle learned that he had been suspended without pay, effectively “rendering his family homeless.”

The FBI also refused to relinquish possession of his personal belongings, including his young children’s clothing.

Special Agent Stephen Friend was also placed on unpaid suspension, with the FBI refusing to allow him to take other employment during this time. Mr. Friend also had his security clearance denied.

Asked about the apparent retaliation, Ms. Cammack said the FBI had suggested to him that it was merely a “coincidence.”

“It’s a coincidence that they leave these people in a position where they cannot seek outside employment, they cannot access their personal belongings, despite the fact that these men have served their country. But even worse, their loyalty to the nation has been questioned. This is truly the weaponization of government,” he said.

It would also seek to temporarily disbar the FBI and DOJ from conducting “politically sensitive investigations” at a time when the agencies are under fire for their conduct against former President Donald Trump.

Earlier this year, the FBI conducted a raid on Mr. Trump’s Mar-a-Lago home, which FBI Director Christopher Wray defended as the “lawful execution of a search warrant” to Congress. Republicans have disagreed, suggesting that the move was a political stunt.

Likewise, DOJ Special Counsel Jack Smith recently announced the decision to press 37 federal charges against Mr. Trump for alleged mishandling of classified documents. Mr. Trump has defended his conduct as protected under the Presidential Records Act, and has characterized the allegations as a politically-driven “witch hunt.”

To that end, the legislation seeks to bar the DOJ and FBI from conducting “a politically sensitive investigation until the Department of Justice establishes a policy requiring non-partisan career staff to oversee such investigations.”

It defined a “politically sensitive investigation” as “investigations of elected officials or their family members, political candidates or their family members, political organizations, religious organizations, and members of the media.”

The bill would additionally prohibit the FBI, DOJ, or other federal agencies from using funds to classify Americans’ speech as “misinformation.”

The prohibition comes amid revelations following Elon Musk’s acquisition of Twitter that the federal government had been in contact with the social media platform to demand that posts, ideas, and stories be censored from the platform. It also prohibits federal agencies from partnering with nonprofit or private organizations for the same effect.

Read More

The bill reads: “None of the funds appropriated or otherwise made available by this Act may be made used to (1) classify or facilitate the classification of any communications by a United States person as misinformation, disinformation, or malinformation; or (2) partner with or fund nonprofit or other organizations that pressure or recommend private companies to censor lawful and constitutionally protected speech of United States persons, including recommending the censoring or removal of content on social media platforms.”

The funding bill addresses a litany of other charged social and political issues, including transgender ideology, COVID-19 mandates, and Second Amendment rights.

Due to its strongly conservative bent, the bill seems likely to fail in the Senate, where Democrats hold the majority.

The FBI did not return a comment on the legislation by press time.