


Women win legal clarity—but Britain’s gender wars intensify
The Supreme Court’s ruling on sex was the easy part. Implementing it will be harder
IT WAS A landmark decision. On April 16th Britain’s Supreme Court ruled that, for the purposes of the Equality Act of 2010, the country’s main anti-discrimination law, “man” refers to a biological man and “woman” to a biological woman. The judgment ended years of legal uncertainty about such matters. Since sex is a protected characteristic under the act, it means a space or service that excludes men, such as a women’s bathroom, can also exclude all transgender women (biological males). The next day, the British Transport Police announced it would now conduct strip searches on the basis of biological sex, rather than how a person identifies.
Explore more
This article appeared in the Britain section of the print edition under the headline “Women’s matter”

Scotland’s outdated land laws threaten the future of rural towns
But progress in reforming them is sluggish

Why building anything in London is so hard
Brownfield projects are bogged down by bewildering bureaucracy

Britain’s Poles now earn more than the natives
Possibly because the least successful migrants have left
Broken windows and pockmarked roads
Britain has become shabbier and more disorderly. Voters have noticed
The strange success of snooker
Immigration, agglomeration and amorality keep the sport going