<div class="css-129jqss en4o1560"><section class="css-u7urgs e12sbwn90"><div class="css-b4a1pi e1u9wqfn0"><span class="css-x8vgju e6e0kfy0"><a href="/the-world-this-week" data-analytics="sidebar:section"><span>The world this week</span></a></span><span class="css-rjcumh e1vi1cqp0"> | The Economist</span></div><h1 class="css-1p83fk8 e1r8fcie0">This week’s covers</h1><h2 class="css-1ms10sa eg03uz0">How we saw the world</h2></section></div><div class="css-129jqss en4o1560"><div class="css-13r0q4k ebbih0g0"><div class="css-191ofav e1oehc1h0"><div class="css-jwv1ak eupm5sl0"><div class="css-w0h03k eygoqsu0"><div><time datetime="2024-10-31T12:05:54.404Z" class="css-1c8ktq7 e4cw3vv0"> Oct 31st 2024</time></div><div><div class="css-1902i5q eygoqsu0"></div></div></div></div></div><section data-body-id="cp2" class="css-1xs6rxu e19oi8vf1"><div class="css-11m2wk0 e19oi8vf2"><p data-component="paragraph" class="css-1f0x4sl e1tt35bk0"><span data-caps="initial">T</span><small>HIS WEEK</small> we had just one cover: our endorsement for America’s election. We argue that a second Trump term comes with unacceptable risks. By making Donald Trump leader of the free world, Americans would be gambling with the economy, the rule of law and international peace.&nbsp;Next to Mr Trump, Kamala Harris stands for stability. True, she is an underwhelming machine politician. However she has abandoned the Democrats’ most left-wing ideas and is campaigning near the centre. If&nbsp;<i>The Economist</i>&nbsp;had a vote, we would cast it for Ms Harris.</p></div></section><div class="css-1cmx12d em0l2j50"><div class="css-19gx9y0 eupm5sl0"><div class="css-15sn8g1 eygoqsu0"><div><div class="css-9mn5vp eygoqsu0"></div></div></div></div></div></div></div>

How we saw the world{ai:summary}<p>This week, The Economist endorses Kamala Harris for the U.S. presidency, citing risks associated with a second Trump term. It argues that Trump poses threats to the economy, rule of law, and international peace, while Harris represents stability despite being a moderate politician.</p><p>The endorsement highlights the choice between a potentially volatile leadership and a centrist approach. If given a vote, The Economist would support Harris. #politics</p>

This week’s covers

This week’s covers

How we saw the world

Loading...