


The wrong way to end a war
Dark lessons from history that explain Vladimir Putin’s “peace-making”
IN THE opening months of the Korean War, one of the bloodiest conflicts ever fought between communist forces and the democratic West, China’s leader, Mao Zedong, cabled his fellow tyrant, Josef Stalin, with thoughts about the deaths that each side needed to suffer. My “overall strategy”, Mao wrote in March 1951, involves “consuming several hundred thousand American lives” in a war lasting years. Only then would the imperialists realise that, in the newly founded People’s Republic of China, they had met their match. Mao had already sent armies of “volunteers” to the Korean peninsula, where combat had raged since the previous summer, after a Soviet-sponsored regime in northern Korea invaded South Korea, ruled by an American ally. Coolly, Mao told Stalin that China expected to lose 300,000 more men to death or maiming.
Explore more

A burning threat to pregnant women
Alarming new research on the link between heat and dangerous pregnancies

Was globalisation ever a meritocracy?
The Trumpian assault on globalism, as seen from Singapore

The end of the second world war
How The Economist reported on the war, week by week
America’s new plan to fight a war with China
Readying for a rumble in the jungle
The War Room newsletter: Seven of the best books on the Pacific war
Richard Cockett, a news editor, recommends seven books about the defeat of Japan in the second world war
How to write laws of war for a wicked world
The post-1945 order is crumbling. History offers a glimpse of alternatives that might work