


The Supreme Court’s term ends with a rash of divisive rulings
Big decisions arrived on guns, abortion, homelessness, presidential power—and more
BEFORE presenting her opinion in a sleeper case on July 1st, the final day of the Supreme Court’s term, Justice Amy Coney Barrett elicited chuckles in the courtroom. “Sorry,” she quipped, announcing the result in Corner Post v Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, “this is not one of the cases you’re waiting to hear.” Chief Justice John Roberts would deliver the highly anticipated presidential-immunity decision—smoothing over Donald Trump’s most profound legal troubles—a few minutes later.
Justice Barrett’s downplaying of that case was misplaced. In her dissent, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson contended that the decision magnified the fallout from Loper Bright v Raimondo, the case that spelt the demise of the Chevron doctrine. This might have been the most important rule governing government that most Americans had never heard of—until the court struck it down this term too. “The tsunami of lawsuits against agencies” would empower plaintiffs to challenge long-settled regulations issued by federal agencies, she warned, and could “devastate the functioning of the federal government”.
Explore more
This article appeared in the United States section of the print edition under the headline “Supremely controversial”

Will IVF really be the next frontier in America’s culture wars?
Banning it would be political suicide. But it could get harder to find in conservative states

What the Chevron ruling means for the next US president
The Supreme Court weakened regulators and created uncertainty, inviting a “tsunami of lawsuits”

The unsteady comeback of the California condor
The bird’s plight is a study in unintended consequences

Will IVF really be the next frontier in America’s culture wars?
Banning it would be political suicide. But it could get harder to find in conservative states

What the Chevron ruling means for the next US president
The Supreme Court weakened regulators and created uncertainty, inviting a “tsunami of lawsuits”

The unsteady comeback of the California condor
The bird’s plight is a study in unintended consequences
Joe Biden is fooling only himself
A president who prides himself on the common touch is insulting everyone’s common sense
The meaning of Donald Trump’s Supreme Court victory
His lawyers’ attempt to delay the election-subversion case worked
Why Joe Biden won’t go
There is something Trumpian about the Democratic Party’s denial of reality