


Progress on the science of menstruation—at last
Newly developed research models show promise
HISTORY OFFERS no shortage of unhinged takes on menstruation. In 77AD, Pliny the Elder claimed that contact with menstrual blood would turn crops barren and drive dogs mad. A medieval medical text warned that the presence of menstruating women would make men ill, and that sex with them would cause cancer of the penis. In the first half of the 20th century, some theorised that periods contained toxins that could wilt flowers.
Such thinking is, obviously, misogynistic nonsense. But menstruation, though not unnatural, is certainly unusual. Humans are among the very small proportion of creatures capable of the feat. That, coupled with the fact that scientists have historically shied away from studying menstruation, has made it far harder to understand the problems that can come with periods, or to develop treatments for them. Fortunately, researchers are now developing a suite of new tools to do just that.

Many Ukrainian drones have been disabled by Russian jamming
Their latest models navigate by sight alone

Hordes of cicadas are emerging simultaneously in America
The ancestors of these two neighbouring broods last met in 1803

A second human case of bird flu in America is raising alarm
How close is the H5N1 outbreak to becoming the next pandemic?