


How courts might stop Donald Trump’s attack on civil society
A recent unanimous Supreme Court case augurs a showdown
IN FEBRUARY 2018 a teenager shot and killed down 14 high-schoolers in Parkland, Florida. As the country reeled, a New York government official sought to weaken America’s gun lobby. Maria Vullo, head of the state’s financial-services regulator, told Lloyd’s of London that if it stopped providing insurance to the National Rifle Association (NRA) the government wouldn’t investigate it for regulatory infractions. Lloyd’s took the deal and the NRA sued, arguing that choking its business for political reasons violated the First Amendment. Last year the Supreme Court agreed unanimously. “Government officials cannot attempt to coerce private parties in order to punish or suppress views that the government disfavours,” Justice Sonya Sotomayor wrote for the justices in NRA v Vullo.
Explore more
This article appeared in the United States section of the print edition under the headline “Protection rackets”

America’s poster-in-chief is very, very online
Compared with his first term, Donald Trump writes less about the economy and more about himself

Expect more chaos in Donald Trump’s tariff policies
He will likely zig-zag in response to markets and Republican dissent

Donald Trump hopes to become a one-man deregulator
He wants to revoke federal rules faster than ever but will meet resistance
How Donald Trump plans to ramp up deportations
A gusher of funds from Congress could accelerate removals
Who will stop Donald Trump’s drive for unchecked power?
Congress is inert, but a deft Supreme Court might contain him
Marco Rubio, MAGA and the State Department’s new look
America’s top diplomat unveils a reorganisation that is significant, but not radical