


Europe’s other front: peaceniks vs hawks
Not all voters favour rearming. Hardly any like paying for it
“TRUMP SAYS defence spending has to go up, and the European Union jumps through the hoop. €800bn ($871bn), whoopee!” Wendela de Vries, a campaigner against the arms trade, is denouncing the EU’s new defence-financing initiative before a few hundred activists at a community centre in Amsterdam. The ReArm Europe credit scheme, announced at a summit on March 6th, was hailed by many as a sign that Europe is getting serious about paying for its security. But to peace activists like Ms de Vries it is greedy militarism, an attempt “to pump up military spending and cut social benefits”.
Explore more
This article appeared in the Europe section of the print edition under the headline “Yes—but how do we pay for it?”

Donald Trump has pushed Europe back into “whatever it takes” mode
Crumbling certitudes lead to renewed fortitude

The struggle to defeat Russian censorship and propaganda
Photons and electrons may matter as much as bullets and bombs

Spain’s terrible record on defence spending
Pedro Sánchez is squeezed between NATO and his coalition partners
Is Zelensky a disliked dictator or a popular hero?
Our poll of Ukrainians shows a surprising shift in the president’s ratings
Is Putin ready to accept a truce with Ukraine?
Probably not. But by agreeing to a 30-day ceasefire, Ukraine has won back crucial American weapons and intelligence
America and Ukraine prepare for brutal negotiations
To get a deal in Jeddah Ukraine must first make peace with Donald Trump