


Europe needs to spend more on defence, not just pretend it is
There’s no such thing as a free tank
As the British government drew up its annual budget in 2015, the sums came out wrong in a troubling way. Cuts across departments meant that spending on defence would come out just shy of 2% of GDP for the first time since the 1930s. That wouldn’t do: only a year earlier Britain had hosted NATO leaders as they formally agreed on the 2% figure, in response to Russia’s first crack at invading Ukraine. A clever way was soon found to spare politicians’ blushes. A few billion pounds of spending that had not in previous years been included in the defence budget was discreetly shuffled into it, in what was politely dubbed a “revised accounting strategy” (also known as “shifting the goalposts”). With the stroke of a pliable accountant’s pen, Britain’s defence budget now included pension payments to war widows and defence-ministry staff, as well as some intelligence spending and contributions to far-flung UN peacekeeping missions. The tactic helped nudge the all-important figure back above the desired threshold.
Explore more

Europe’s arms makers have ramped up capacity
Now they need governments to place bigger orders

Erdogan arrests the candidate who could beat him
Turkey’s president fears to run against Ekrem Imamoglu, Istanbul’s mayor
Putin woos Trump with a partial ceasefire and big geopolitical deal
Russia wants to talk to America over the heads of Ukraine and other European countries
Ukraine’s army escapes from Kursk by the skin of its teeth
Ukraine will have less Russian land than it hoped to trade for peace