Weird. Creepy. Those words are being tossed about quite a bit lately. But for all the Democrats' flailing efforts to make the schoolyard taunts stick to the GOP presidential ticket, I think we've found an instance where their application is wholly warranted: "Quiet Skies." 

We first caught wind (pardon the pun) of the program's recent (mis)application when a story broke over the weekend regarding the revelation that former Congresswoman and presidential candidate Tulsi Gabbard had landed on the TSA surveillance list as part of its Quiet Skies program, which is, purportedly, aimed at protecting American air travelers from domestic terrorists. Stranger still was the timing of Gabbard's addition to that list.

Tulsi Gabbard Is Reportedly Under TSA Surveillance. Why?

Would the TSA have us believe that Tulsi Gabbard is a suspected domestic terrorist? Why? Well, it is as you might suspect:

According to (Executive Director of the Air Marshal National Council (AMNC) Sonya) LaBosco, Gabbard’s enrollment in Quiet Skies is likely politically motivated. Air Marshals were first assigned to Gabbard on Jul. 23, a day after she criticized Kamala Harris, Biden, and the National Security State in an interview with Laura Ingraham. FAMs were mobilized on Jul. 24 and assigned to their first flight with her on Jul. 25. Gabbard posted the interview on Twitter, as shared below.  

As if that weren't twisted enough, now we learn that the TSA whistleblowers who came forward with their concerns about this development are facing retaliatory investigations of their own. 

On Wednesday, Tristan Leavitt, president of Empower Oversight, shared his firm's follow-up letter to Department of Homeland Security Inspector General Joseph Cuffari, alerting the IG to the potential retaliation and requesting that he ensure the whistleblowers are properly protected. 

 @EMPOWR_us has confirmed from whistleblowers that @TulsiGabbard was under Quiet Skies surveillance on not just one, or two, or even three flights... She has had Air Marshals there to monitor her on EIGHT FLIGHTS since her July 23 interview with @IngrahamAngle. 

Furthermore, TSA is mobilizing a retaliatory investigation into who made these protected whistleblower disclosures. I wrote to @DHSOIG this morning asking him to ensure these whistleblowers are protected.

Leavitt's thread lays out the thrust of the correspondence directed to Cuffari. In sum, the letter, which may be viewed in full below, sets forth the following key points:

Related: Surprise: Not All of FBI Director Christopher Wray's
Testimony on Wednesday Was Forthright

The Purge: FBI Abused Security Clearance Process to Weed Out Employees With 'Wrong' Political Views

As Leavitt also notes on Twitter/X, the Quiet Skies program has not even been shown to be effective at its purported aim.

The whole Quiet Skies program seems like a civil liberties nightmare anyway. 

Over four years the OIG examined, the found Quiet Skies confirmed precisely zero passengers as aviation security threats. I can think of far better uses for the hundreds of thousands of dollars DHS puts into this. (Like, say, ensuring a major party's political nominee is protected from attempted assassination the day after an Iranian asset is arrested for plotting a murder-for-hire?)

So, not only has the TSA been wasting resources on an intrusive yet ineffective program and further deployed it against a high-profile political figure (and military reservist) the day after she voiced criticism of the Biden administration's involvement in Ukraine, it's apparently opened a retaliatory investigation into those who came forward with concerns over this action. 

Weird? Creepy? Yes. And I'd add sinister and unconstitutional to the mix. 

2024-08-07 TL to DHS OIG Re TSA Investigation by Susie Moore on Scribd

mmm