As the federal government stumbles into its second week of partial shutdown, the real pain settles in not on Capitol Hill but in the quiet routines of the 2.1 million federal workers staring down missed paychecks. National parks close their gates, IRS refunds stall, and families budget around the uncertainty. Yet amid this avoidable mess, a handful of lawmakers are doing something quietly principled: forgoing their salaries until the lights flicker back on.
It's a gesture that cuts through the partisan fog, reminding us that accountability starts at home. Take the Republicans leading the charge. Texas Rep. Chip Roy, never one to mince words on fiscal restraint, has asked his office to withhold his pay for the duration. He's joined by Iowa's Ashley Hinson and Mariannette Miller-Meeks, Michigan's Tom Barrett, and Pennsylvania's Rob Bresnahan—all opting out of the $174,000 annual salary that hasn't budged since 2009.
On the Senate side, Florida's Ashley Moody is donating hers daily to the Crisis Center of Tampa Bay, a lifeline for the vulnerable caught in the crossfire of what she calls this "reckless choice."
Lindsey Graham of South Carolina is right there with her, pledging his check to charity. These aren't grandstanding moves; they're calculated nods to the staffers who, by law, miss their pay but get it retroactively once the spigot opens again. Even a few Democrats are signing on, which says something about the shutdown's bipartisan exhaustion.
New Jersey's Josh Gottheimer and California's Lou Correa have requested the hold on the Democratic side. Morelle points out the mechanics: Checks can sit in escrow, untouched until resolution, thanks to an administrative workaround that skirts the Constitution's ironclad pay guarantee in Article I and the 27th Amendment's election-delay clause.
RELATED: Should America's Heroes Be Worried? How the Shutdown Affects the Veterans Administration.
New Poll Shows Americans, Regardless of Party, Have No Appetite for Schumer Shutdown Games
It's not full sacrifice—back pay waits for all—but it signals solidarity without the legal gymnastics of outright refusal. This trend merits attention because it exposes the shutdown's core absurdity. Senate Democrats have stonewalled a straightforward Republican proposal to fund agencies through November 21, multiple times over, turning a routine appropriations bill into a standoff.
The result? Essential services grind down while lawmakers, leadership perks aside, draw from the same pot they're failing to refill. Sure, the opt-outs are symbolic, but symbols matter when trust in Washington hovers near freezing. They humanize the Hill, contrasting sharply with the finger-pointing that's defined this impasse. That said, gestures alone won't balance the books or reopen the Smithsonian. The real test is whether this self-imposed pinch inspires actual compromise.
Republicans have laid out a clean extension; Democrats counter with demands tied to broader spending fights. Both sides know prolonged shutdowns erode public faith—polls already show approval for Congress dipping below 20 percent. If these salary skips prod leaders toward a deal, fine. But the path out of this isn't more theater. It's swallowing pride, passing the funding, and getting back to the work taxpayers expect. In the end, these lawmakers aren't heroes or martyrs. They're public servants doing the bare minimum to align their actions with their rhetoric. In a town where words often outpace deeds, that's progress worth noting—and emulating.
Editor’s Note: The Schumer Shutdown is here. Rather than put the American people first, Chuck Schumer and the radical Democrats forced a government shutdown for healthcare for illegals. They own this.
Help us continue to report the truth about the Schumer Shutdown. Use promo code POTUS47 to get 74% off your VIP membership.