THE AMERICA ONE NEWS
Jun 2, 2025  |  
0
 | Remer,MN
Sponsor:  QWIKET 
Sponsor:  QWIKET 
Sponsor:  QWIKET: Elevate your fantasy game! Interactive Sports Knowledge.
Sponsor:  QWIKET: Elevate your fantasy game! Interactive Sports Knowledge and Reasoning Support for Fantasy Sports and Betting Enthusiasts.
back  
topic
David Manney


NextImg:When Wausau Imitated 2008: Free Land, a Minor, and Bad Logic

You may be reading this from Alabama. 

Or Arkansas. 

Or a quiet corner of Ohio, wondering, 

“Why should I care what happened in Wausau, Wisconsin?”

Here’s why: because Wausau is you. 

It’s me. 

It’s America’s Main Street in miniature. 

And when leftist economic malpractice takes root in small towns, it’s not localized; it’s symptomatic. When the rot shows up in Wausau, it’s spreading everywhere else, too.

The scandal that just unfolded in this quiet Wisconsin town isn’t a quirky fluke or a local slip-up. 

It’s a warning sign. A miniature remake of the 2008 housing crash, starring your local government in the role of reckless lender and starring ideological softness in the role of common sense.

What happened?

A 17-year-old boy, yes, seventeen, was nearly awarded three city-owned lots to develop as part of Wausau’s affordable housing initiative. 

Not because he had experience. 

Not because he had the legal capacity to sign contracts. 

Not because he could actually build anything. 

But because, according to the city, he made enough money.

That’s it. That’s the whole vetting process.

And if that doesn’t remind you of the policies that detonated the U.S. housing market in 2008, you weren’t paying attention then or now.

Gunther Nowak, the teenager in question, applied to buy three riverfront parcels for $1,000. He pitched a plan to build a duplex, live in one half, and rent out the other. 

Related: When Wausau Imitated 2008: Free Land, a Minor, and Bad Logic

It wasn’t a bad idea, really. 

He showed initiative.

But he also showed up at the real estate table legally underage. 

And nobody in Wausau noticed.

The city council approved the deal by a vote of 8–2. No one thought to ask his age. 

Why? 

Because he met the income threshold for the city’s affordable housing program, and in progressive America, income is king. If your W-2 shows enough zeroes, you can bypass adulthood.

Forget legal capacity. 

Forget credit history. 

Forget the fact that he’s not even old enough to vote in the elections that gave this city council their seats.

Mayor Doug Diny vetoed the deal once he caught the error. The teenager eventually withdrew his proposal. 

That this almost happened under the watch of elected officials whose sole job was to safeguard taxpayer resources should set off alarms from Wausau to Wichita.

Because what Wausau just revealed is a playbook that never stopped running. It’s the same progressive logic that says, “If someone wants something badly enough, it’s cruel to deny them.” 

It’s the same thinking that collapsed an entire economy 16 years ago. And it’s back, just smaller and quieter.

This time, instead of Wall Street banks, it's municipal councils. 

Instead of subprime mortgages, it’s subsidized land grants. 

But the disease is the same: compassion without competency.

Back in the early 2000s, government regulators and progressive politicians pressured banks to relax lending standards in the name of “equity.” 

They rewarded institutions for giving loans to people who couldn’t afford homes. 

They accepted verbal claims of income. 

They ignored credit risk. 

They inflated housing access like a balloon and acted shocked when it popped.

Wausau’s decision was cut from the same cloth.

They didn’t ask if the buyer had building experience. 

They didn’t ask if he could secure financing. 

They didn’t even ask if he could legally enter a contract. 

They saw he made some money and waved it through.

This is what progressive governance looks like when it trickles down to your hometown. And the people most at risk? The middle class, the working poor, and the taxpayers are funding these “inclusionary” experiments.

When the policy fails, it’s not the council members who pay. It’s in your neighborhood. It’s your property value. It’s your tax bill.

The city says it will now “review its vetting process.” Swell. 

That’s code for: “We got caught doing something stupid and need to pretend we’re learning from it.”

Let’s not pretend this was an honest mistake. This was the direct consequence of a governing ideology that prioritizes optics over outcomes. 

They weren’t building a city. 

They were building a feel-good story. 

They were hoping to pat themselves on the back for empowering youth, and they almost handed over public land because they couldn’t be bothered to check a birthdate.

This is the same mindset that has school boards ignoring academic failure to chase equity benchmarks. It’s the same logic that forgives debt without asking why it was incurred. It’s the belief that warm intentions are better than proven results.

And that’s not government; it’s charity work with a tax base.

Because your town’s next. Because this exact type of policy is quietly embedded in zoning laws, housing commissions, and “affordable development” boards from coast to coast.

It’s happening under the radar in red and blue states alike. It’s cloaked in language such as “equity,” “opportunity,” and “inclusive growth.” 

And it sounds nice until your city accidentally signs away land to someone who can’t legally drive at night without a parent in the passenger seat.

This story isn’t about Wausau. 

It’s about everywhere.

It’s about the left’s endless war on standards: financial, legal, and moral. 

It’s about the belief that qualification is discrimination. 

It’s about replacing merit with emotion. 

And it’s proof that 2008 wasn’t a lesson learned. It was a dry run.

We should celebrate ambition. Günther Nowak is a bright young man who is likely to succeed in life. 

But the role of government is not to indulge ambition without asking questions. It’s protecting the public from risks, especially self-inflicted ones.

If Wausau had followed through, it would’ve set a precedent that income equals eligibility. That a paycheck, no matter how temporary or unproven, makes you qualified to buy public land and build housing.

That’s not how cities thrive. That’s how they collapse under the weight of policies designed to look good on paper rather than hold up in reality.

If your city will hand over real estate because someone “makes enough,” it’s already infected. If your council is more concerned with virtue signaling than legal compliance, your tax dollars are in jeopardy.

And if this happened in Wausau, sleepy, well-meaning, middle-of-America Wausau, it can happen anywhere.

Even Alabama.

Trump’s law-and-order push is working, but blue cities keep coddling criminals.

We report what’s actually happening in the streets. Join PJ Media VIP and use FIGHT to save 60%.