For most people, ChatGPT is more of a toy than a tool. You can ask it silly questions, but it’s not robust enough to write high-quality work memos or school essays. Yet the people behind artificial intelligence programs believe these systems will someday become a regular part of our lives, helping us in day-to-day routines.
How? Some type of A.I. will usher in that reality not because it will be perfect or display human-level intelligence. It will simply perform a task better than people can now. We don’t yet know what that task or the piece of A.I. will be. Perhaps it will be a task that seems small but nonetheless takes up time, like writing an email response or organizing a schedule. Or it could be bigger, such as driving a car. Either way, the shift will be enough to get the public to widely adopt it.
Phone cameras are a useful analogy. They typically take lower quality photographs than stand-alone cameras. But most people have embraced them because they are so convenient, packaged in devices most of us carry everywhere. That sort of usefulness is a much lower bar for A.I. to meet than creating the kind of all-knowing, all-doing A.I. depicted in science fiction.
Then, widespread adoption could help A.I. rapidly improve further. The technology is built on data. And the more people use A.I., the more data developers can collect to adapt their programs. Today’s newsletter will look at how that future could start.
Better, not perfect
There is a pithy way to describe how technology progresses: It has to be better, not perfect.
One example is A.I. that can code. People who don’t know how to code already use bots to produce full-fledged games, as my colleagues Francesca Paris and Larry Buchanan explained. And some professional programmers use A.I. to supplement their work.
The current technology is imperfect. It can make mistakes, and it struggles with more complicated tasks or programs. But the same is true for human coders. “Humans are not perfect at many of the tasks they perform,” said Helen Toner, a director at Georgetown University’s Center for Security and Emerging Technology.
By this standard, coding bots do not have to be flawless to replace existing work. They merely have to save time. A human coder could then use that extra time to improve on the A.I.’s work, brainstorm other ideas for programs or do something else entirely.
Unintended consequences
A.I. outcomes won’t always be good. With phone cameras, people sacrifice photo quality for convenience. The trade-offs could be more consequential with artificial intelligence.
Consider an A.I. that can write well. At first, the quality might fall short of writing you can do yourself. Still, like a coding A.I., it could give you time that you could use to sharpen the draft, focus on research or complete a different task.
But this bot also might not care about some qualities that humans value. Perhaps it will spin out falsehoods that some writers won’t catch before publishing online. Or bad actors could use A.I. to create and distribute well-written disinformation more efficiently.
In other words, what an A.I. does can fail to align with its creators’ or users’ goals. “It’s a very general technology that’s going to be used for so many things,” Katja Grace, an A.I. safety researcher, said. “So it’s much harder to anticipate all the ways that you might be training it to do something that could be harmful.”
Here’s a real-world example: Ted Rall, a political cartoonist, recently asked ChatGPT to describe his relationship with Scott Stantis, another cartoonist. It falsely suggested Stantis had accused Rall of plagiarism in 2002 and that both of them had a public feud. None of this happened.
But current A.I. technologies frequently produce these kinds of tall tales — what experts call hallucinations — when asked about real people or events. Experts aren’t sure why. One potential explanation is that these systems are primarily programmed to put out convincing, conversational writing, not to distinguish fact from fiction. As similar A.I. replaces human tasks or current technologies (such as search engines), the falsehoods could mislead many more people.
Exponential growth
A.I. is developing incredibly quickly. The computing power behind the technology has grown exponentially for decades, and experts expect it to continue doing so. As impressive as GPT-4 is, we could plausibly get A.I. programs that are many times as powerful in the span of years.
This technology is developing so quickly that lawmakers and other regulators have been unable to keep up. More than 1,000 tech leaders and researchers recently called for a pause on A.I. development to establish safety standards. So far, there is no sign those calls have been heeded. Tech companies like Google and Microsoft have instead resisted internal dissent against releasing their A.I. programs and have pushed them out to the public as quickly as possible.
For more
Here are 35 ways people are using A.I. right now, including planning workouts and writing a wedding speech.
A.I.’s potential impact is too sweeping for governments to take a hands-off approach, Ezra Klein argues in Times Opinion.
THE LATEST NEWS
Politics
President Biden is finalizing his plan to enter the 2024 race, with an announcement coming possibly as early as Tuesday. See who is running.
The Supreme Court is expected to decide by tonight whether an abortion pill should remain widely available while an appeal moves forward.
Mike Lindell, the MyPillow founder, offered $5 million to anyone who could disprove his election fraud claims. Arbitrators say he must pay a man who did so.
International
“We will hunt you”: Some Ugandans are fleeing their homes before an anti-gay law threatening lifetime prison sentences takes effect.
The Pentagon is sending U.S. troops to eastern Africa for a possible evacuation of the American Embassy in Sudan.
Xi Jinping, China’s leader, has welcomed world leaders to Beijing in recent weeks — but has rebuffed and criticized the U.S.
Britain’s deputy prime minister, Dominic Raab, resigned after a bullying investigation.
Many Russian prisoners are H.I.V. positive. They were promised anti-viral medications if they agreed to fight in the war against Ukraine.
Business
BuzzFeed is shutting down its news division, which won a Pulitzer Prize in 2021.
Twitter began removing verified check marks from accounts and charging a subscription fee for the symbol.
Facebook agreed to pay $725 million in a settlement over user data. Anyone who had an account in the past 15 years can claim a share.
Other Big Stories
SpaceX’s Starship, a rocket set to carry humans to the moon in the coming years, exploded minutes into its test launch. Still, engineers say the test provided useful data.
Prosecutors dropped charges against Alec Baldwin in the shooting death of a cinematographer on the set of the film “Rust.”
In an armed nation, everyday errors like knocking on the wrong door can be deadly.
The $787.5 million settlement that Fox News made with Dominion came together at the last minute.
Drug dealers are mixing a tranquilizer for horses into fentanyl, with deadly results.
A large container carrying $15 million in gold and valuables vanished from Toronto’s airport.
Opinions
The rise in anorexia in young girls is a sign they’re taking their pain out on themselves. We need to determine why, Pamela Paul argues.
Whether microplastics have a damaging effect on our well-being is uncertain, Mark O’Connell writes, making it the perfect scapegoat for any malady.
MORNING READS
Diamond district: In this small slice of New York, old-world jewelers and TikTok stars work side by side.
Celestial spectacle: See the total solar eclipse over Western Australia.
Polly wants a chat: Scientists let parrots call their parrot friends over video.
Advice from Wirecutter: How to limit exposure to chemicals in cookware.
Lives Lived: Loren Cameron was a photographer and activist whose groundbreaking portraits of himself and other transgender people inspired a generation. He died at 63.
SPORTS NEWS FROM THE ATHLETIC
Taunting and crotch shots: James Harden, the 76ers guard, and Nic Claxton, the Nets center, were both ejected from the N.B.A. playoff’s Game 3 in Brooklyn. See the flagrant fouls.
The Oakland A’s: The baseball team said it had agreed to a land deal that could see the franchise move to Las Vegas by 2027.
Ten-game ban: Max Scherzer, the Mets’ ace, was suspended after umpires found a sticky substance on his hand.
ARTS AND IDEAS
Pop in the desert
Today is the start of the second weekend of Coachella, the California festival that has grown into one of the biggest annual events for pop music and celebrity sightings. Some highlights from the first weekend:
Blackpink became the first K-pop act to headline the festival, delivering a 90-minute set that The Guardian described as a “high-octane stream of pop bangers.”
The pop-punk band Blink-182 surprised fans with a reunion show, playing together for the first time in almost a decade.
The most divisive performance came from Frank Ocean, who reimagined his songs in new styles. Variety called it “a near-disaster,” while The Los Angeles Times labeled it “an instant classic.”
This weekend’s shows begin today, at noon Pacific time, and continue through Sunday night. You can watch live on Coachella’s YouTube page.
PLAY, WATCH, EAT
What to Cook
This avocado salad is simple and luscious.
What to Watch
“Carol” and “Glass Onion”: The 50 best movies on Netflix right now.
Late Night
The hosts mocked the SpaceX explosion.
Now Time to Play
The pangram from yesterday’s Spelling Bee was phenomena. Here are today’s puzzle and the Bee Buddy, which helps you find remaining words.
And here are the Mini Crossword, Wordle and today’s Sudoku.
Thanks for spending part of your morning with The Times. See you tomorrow. — German
P.S. The New York Times Games Spelling Bee is a Shorty Awards finalist and needs your votes to win.
Here’s today’s front page.
“The Daily” is about the Pentagon leak.
Sign up here to get this newsletter in your inbox. Reach our team at themorning@nytimes.com.