Over 100 miles north of London, Britain’s last coal-fired power station, the Ratcliffe-on-Soar plant, will be powered down on Monday, ending Britain’s reliance on coal for power. The plant, outside Nottingham, will cease operations permanently.

It is a remarkable moment for a country that was the first to exploit coal in vast quantities, using it to make steel and glass and kick-starting the Industrial Revolution in the process. Coal turned the machinery in textile factories; it fueled the locomotives on railways; it replaced wood fireplaces, heating British homes. Most of all, it provided electricity.

Coal-fired power stations like Ratcliffe accounted for more than three-quarters of Britain’s electricity generation as recently as the early 1990s. But in the ensuing years the country has reduced its reliance on coal faster than any other major industrialized nation. Last year coal provided only 1.3 percent of Britain’s power, with a little more than a third coming from gas-fired power stations and a little less than a third coming from wind turbines.

Few in Britain — including me — will mourn the passing of coal or the closure of plants such as Ratcliffe. Coal-fired power is the single largest source of global greenhouse gas emissions, responsible for much of the climate crisis that is only growing worse.

Even so, it’s hard not to feel a little nervous about what, at its heart, is an experiment, one fraught with danger. Britain has turned itself into a test case for what happens when you take an industrial economy and rapidly wind down the use of fossil fuels. Already, there are consequences: higher power costs and a shrinking manufacturing base. The health of the country’s economy — and the willingness of other countries to follow — may very well ride on the experiment’s success.

The pressure is on in part because of a highly ambitious deadline set by the new Labour government to achieve a carbon-neutral power system by 2030. Unlike our Scandinavian neighbors, Britain does not have enough hydroelectric dams to provide the bulk of the power we need. Our fleet of nuclear power stations is smaller and older than France’s. Last year the Climate Change Committee, a public body that scrutinizes environmental policy, warned that the country wasn’t even on track to hit this goal by 2035, let alone five years earlier.