THE AMERICA ONE NEWS
Jun 3, 2025  |  
0
 | Remer,MN
Sponsor:  QWIKET 
Sponsor:  QWIKET 
Sponsor:  QWIKET: Elevate your fantasy game! Interactive Sports Knowledge.
Sponsor:  QWIKET: Elevate your fantasy game! Interactive Sports Knowledge and Reasoning Support for Fantasy Sports and Betting Enthusiasts.
back  
topic
NY Post
New York Post
4 May 2023


NextImg:The week in whoppers: Chuck Schumer’s ‘distraction,’ Rep. Tlaib’s anti-Israel slur and more

vs.

“New York passes ban on gas stoves for new residential buildings”

— The Hill, Wednesday

We say: Just who’s trying to “distract” from a “real issue” Americans care about?

We say: Talk about “rewriting history!”

Israel became a country after the UN gave it its blessing following the “ethnic cleansing” of … Jews, during the Holocaust.

And though Palestinian Arabs had already gotten a home in what is now Jordan, the UN came up with a plan to also give them a share of the remaining land.

Israel accepted that, but the Palestinians still weren’t satisfied; they and several Arab nations attacked the nascent state.

That’s how Israel was “born.”

Oh, and there’s no apartheid in Israel; Arabs have basically the same rights as everyone else.

“Real wages are higher than they were just nine months ago.”

— WH Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre, Tuesday

We say: Sorry, but last month President Biden’s own Bureau of Labor Statistics reported that “real average hourly earnings decreased 0.7 percent, seasonally adjusted, from March 2022 to March 2023.”

And, per Federal Reserve data, median real weekly earnings are down about 2.7% since Biden took office. 

We say: Huh?

No bills ban any of these people from serving in legislatures, let alone “existing.

In fact, they’re really not even “anti-gay” or “-LGBTQ+” but merely seek to ban age-inappropriate discussions of sexual and gender-related topics in schools and libraries — as well as medically unnecessary, irreversible therapies for young kids who might later regret getting them.

We say: Twitter users doubted Biden was even capable of making this chart, simplistic (and wrong) as it is.

Yet just because the GOP bill, which limits federal outlays, doesn’t specifically exclude veterans from potential cuts in benefits, it by no means requires any cuts at all to their funding. 

— Compiled by The Post Editorial Board