THE AMERICA ONE NEWS
Jul 2, 2025  |  
0
 | Remer,MN
Sponsor:  QWIKET 
Sponsor:  QWIKET 
Sponsor:  QWIKET: Elevate your fantasy game! Interactive Sports Knowledge.
Sponsor:  QWIKET: Elevate your fantasy game! Interactive Sports Knowledge and Reasoning Support for Fantasy Sports and Betting Enthusiasts.
back  
topic


NextImg:Not OK, Karen! Court loses it when lawyer calls someone ‘Karen’ in legal papers: ‘Borderline racist, sexist, and ageist’

You Karen’t say that!

A British court tore into an attorney who called someone a “Karen” in papers for a discrimination case — calling the term “borderline racist, sexist, and ageist,” according to a report.

A British employment tribunal judge ruled that Karen is a “borderline racist, sexist, and ageist,” slang term. Witoon – stock.adobe.com

Sylvia Constance, a 74-year-old black woman, was suing for discrimination after she was axed from a charity company called Harpenden Mencap — but an employment tribunal took issue when the ousted worker’s rep used the phrase in court papers, the Independent reported.

Attorney Christine Yates argued leadership at the charity — supports adults with learning disabilities — leadership “acted like stereotypical Karens” — claiming they weaponized their privilege to suspend and fire Constance over “fictitious claims, the report said.

Constance accused the organization of unfair dismissal, racial and age discrimination and of launching a campaign to oust her based on prejudice, the outlet said.

Yates alleged that a white, female management team had colluded with white male residents under their care to create a racist and misogynistic smear campaign, the outlet reported.

HM Courts & Tribunals Service sign with coat of arms.
Tribunal judge George Alliot took issue with the use of the term “Karen” in legal filings. pxl.store – stock.adobe.com

Tribunal judge George Alliot took issue with Yates’s use of the term “Karen” in legal filings.

“We note Christine Yates uses the slang term ‘Karen’, which is a pejorative and borderline racist, sexist, and ageist term,” Alliot said.

The tribunal ultimately dismissed Constance’s claims, siding with the charity for firing her in June 2023 over an “irretrievable breakdown” of workplace relationships, the outlet reported.

Alliot also ruled that the complaints against Constance were “legitimate,” the outlet said.