THE AMERICA ONE NEWS
Feb 22, 2025  |  
0
 | Remer,MN
Sponsor:  QWIKET AI 
Sponsor:  QWIKET AI 
Sponsor:  QWIKET AI: Interactive Sports Knowledge.
Sponsor:  QWIKET AI: Interactive Sports Knowledge and Reasoning Support.
back  
topic
NY Post
New York Post
22 Mar 2024


NextImg:Nebraska vs. Texas A&M prediction: March Madness odds, picks, bets

After a wild first day of the NCAA Tournament, here’s an intriguing South Region matchup on my betting card on Friday. 

Nebraska has a half-decent matchup in the opening round.

The Cornhuskers should be able to create off-ball perimeter shots with Keisei Tominaga against Texas A&M’s under-screening defense, which allows a ton of 3s. 

But the Cornhuskers are at a significant, possibly impossible-to-overcome disadvantage because the Aggies should dominate the boards. 

Texas A&M is college basketball’s best offensive rebounding team, leading the nation in offensive rebounding rate (42 percent) and second-chance points (17). 

And Nebraska has difficulty on the boards, ranking 223rd in defensive rebounding rate (70 percent) and 300th in percentage of points allowed on second-chance opportunities (16 percent). 

Texas A&M forward Henry Coleman III.
Texas A&M forward Henry Coleman III. Icon Sportswire via Getty Images

Texas A&M might struggle to create first-shot offense or defend Nebraska’s first-shot offense, but the Aggies will grab most of the 50/50 balls and score relentlessly by playing volleyball on the offensive boards. 

At minimum, that gives Texas A&M a very consistent avenue to offense. 

The Aggies also have a pretty significant athletic advantage.

They should be able to create plus isolation mismatches across the roster, especially with star point guard Wade Taylor IV and bully-ball wing Tyrece Radford. 

The schematic matchup isn’t excellent, but the Aggies should dominate the extras, especially with their steady ball-handling (21st nationally in turnover rate) and foul-drawing ability(top-50 nationally in free throw rate). 

Recommendation: Texas A&M +1.5.