THE AMERICA ONE NEWS
Jun 2, 2025  |  
0
 | Remer,MN
Sponsor:  QWIKET 
Sponsor:  QWIKET 
Sponsor:  QWIKET: Elevate your fantasy game! Interactive Sports Knowledge.
Sponsor:  QWIKET: Elevate your fantasy game! Interactive Sports Knowledge and Reasoning Support for Fantasy Sports and Betting Enthusiasts.
back  
topic
NY Post
New York Post
11 Jan 2024


NextImg:Michigan State vs. Illinois prediction: College basketball odds, pick

Illinois is in a bad place.

The Illini are without Terrence Shannon Jr., their leading scorer and best player who is serving a suspension after being charged with rape.

How will they respond Thursday night vs. Michigan State? 

Well, they’re 2-1 since Shannon’s departure, with dominating blowout wins over Fairleigh Dickinson and Northwestern paired with a five-point road loss to Purdue. 

Honestly, that’s not bad.

Southern Illinois transfer Marcus Domask is turning into a star, dropping 58 points over his past two contests.

He’s been excellent as an isolation scorer, which is huge for Brad Underwood’s iso-heavy offense.

That begs the question: Can Sparty stop Domask one-on-one? The answer is a resounding yes. 

For all its troubles on the offensive end, Michigan State boasts a rock-solid interior defense.

Malik Hall, Jaden Akins and Coen Carr are good wing defenders, and the Spartans rank top-40 nationally in isolation PPP allowed (0.78). 

The Spartans allow only 25 paint points per game, ranking in the 94th percentile of D-I teams. Domask is primarily an interior bucket-getter, and I expect he’ll struggle against Sparty on the block.

Plus, Shannon’s absence as a ball-screen initiator and fellow shot-creator will show in this matchup. 

Quincy Guerrier #13 of the Illinois Fighting Illini.

Illinois guard/forward Quincy Guerrier Getty Images

Illinois’ bail-out option is cutting and posting with Dain Dainja and Quincy Guerrier. But, again, Michigan State boasts a strong interior defense.

The Spartans excel at defending cutters (1.07 PPP allowed, 78th percentile) and are above the D-I average against posters (0.82 PPP allowed, 58th percentile). 

On the other end of the court, Sparty runs a guard-focused, ball-screen-heavy attack spearheaded by the elite backcourt of Tyson Walker and AJ Hoggard.

Unfortunately, they’re getting nothing from their frontcourt, scoring inefficiently on the interior.

This means opposing offenses can space the floor and play aggressively on the perimeter, denying good 3-point looks. 

So, Michigan State’s offense devolves into dribble-drive, midrange shots from Walker. It’s an inefficient way to play modern basketball. 

Even worse, Illinois is an elite midrange defense, ranking 11th nationally in midrange PPP allowed (0.73).

Even without Shannon, Illinois has the individual defenders to defend on an island — specifically, Domask, Luke Goode and Coleman Hawkins. 

Michigan State’s bailout option is off-ball-screen actions to pop open Walker from deep.

But Illinois also excels at defending off-ball-screen actions (0.97 PPP allowed, 16th nationally), and the Illini run guys off the 3-point line (22nd nationally in 3-point rate allowed). 

What does this all mean? 

It means a low-scoring rock fight.

Expect Sparty to peddle in the midrange and get shut down by Illinois, while the Illini won’t be able to generate interior isolation buckets against Michigan State. 

The past few Illinois-Michigan State battles have soared over the total, but that was with Shannon.

Without him, Illinois loses its most viable path to offense. 

And Sparty had real interior offense in the past few matchups, especially with spot-up legend Joey Hauser.

Michigan State won’t have open lanes through without his spacing and driving.

So, I’ll happily bet the Under 148.

I see these teams playing in the mid-60s, with the game eventually landing around 135 combined points.