New York is on track to become the 12th state to legalize “assisted suicide” — and with the most radical law yet.

The state Senate was rushing to vote late Monday on Sen. Brad Hoylman-Sigal’s Medical Aid in Dying Act, with insiders certain the wheels were fully greased for passage.

So it’ll be up to Gov. Kathy Hochul to wield her veto and prevent a disgraceful mistake.

Again, the New York bill breaks new ground — or sinks to a newer low.

All 11 other states (Delaware became No. 11 last month) require a waiting period before you get your suicide-meds prescription filled; it’s 15 days in Oregon but could be less than 24 hours in New York.

The Empire State bill also has no real mechanism for tracking how many deaths it brings: Some commissioner is supposed to review a “sample” of patient medical records and produce a yearly report to the Legislature on how it’s going; that’s it.

Beyond the details, this is fundamentally about a reinvention of the medical profession: Out goes “do no harm,” in comes a “calculation” as to whether a given life is still worth living.  

With the state, and insurance companies, having a clear financial interest in ending “marginal” lives and those whose care costs “too much.”

Anyone who wants to die can, in fact, find a way: This is purely about giving “assisted suicide” the moral force of law, a big first step on the way to euthanasia for those with chronic conditions — even Alzheimer’s.

Canada is about to expand its law to allow “doctor-assisted” killing in some cases where the underlying condition is mental disease, such as depression or anxiety.

Advocates claim New York’s bill covers only people with terminal diagnoses and six months or less to live — but “terminal” isn’t as exact a term as it sounds, and any diagnosis is simply a doctor’s best guess.

It’s entirely appropriate that the chief Democratic resistance to this bill has been among lawmakers of color: Philosophically as well as historically, euthanasia is intimately connected with eugenics.

That is: The same geniuses who imagine that humanity can be “scientifically” improved by eliminating “inferior characteristics” from the breeding pool also tend to think “experts” can calculate which lives have values less than zero.

Embrace that pseudo-mathematics, and soon enough the smart set will be busy “helping” the disabled and those suffering chronic illnesses to “realize” they’re better off ending their lives. 

We have no idea what back-room deals suddenly made this bill a priority at the very end of the legislative session; it certainly wasn’t any shift in public opinion.

Hochul should do the right thing and kill the bill: At the very least, that’ll force its supporters to explain why New York must have fewer safeguards than any state against abuse of a law that turns doctors into executioners.