The Issue: The Dem nominee’s ever-changing positions on inflation and other economic issues.

Vice President Kamala Harris can try to disavow all of President Biden’s economic policies, which have wreaked havoc on this country for four years.

But the inescapable fact remains that it was it was the Biden-Harris administration that created those policies (“Kam’s New Deal,” Aug. 15).

Are we to believe that when Harris becomes president she will suddenly become a fiscally responsible centrist?

Nope.

She owns the Biden policies, every one of which she endorsed.

Robert Mangi

Garden City

Does Harris believe what she said before or what she is saying now?

Remember what Biden claimed during the 2020 election: “I’m not a socialist, I beat the socialists.”

For the next four years, Biden went left.

Does anyone believe that Harris’ economic stance has been centrist this whole time?

Remember, too, that Sens. Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren are fully supporting her.

Harris’ whole administration will be loaded with far-left progressives.

Maybe she won’t ban fracking, but I bet the practice will be regulated out of business.

A leopard can’t change its spots.

Bruce Collins

Middletown , NJ

As a Democratic aide put it in regard to Harris’ campaign, “With such a short timeline now, policy matters less than personality.”

Well, both her policies and her personality are absolutely terrible.

Bob Robustelli

Stamford, Conn.

Harris is suggesting that the cause of today’s inflation is “price gouging” by corporations (“Kam’s $$ track record laughable,” Douglas Murray, Aug. 16).

She’s asking us to believe that her deciding votes on the American Rescue Plan and Inflation Reduction Act had nothing to do with it.

It’s hard to imagine a less serious candidate.

James Evans

Worcester, Mass.

Douglas Murray’s article walks us through the financial pain most Americans have suffered through the Biden presidency.

It’s the problem that pains Americans the most, which Harris needs to explain.

As the expression goes: “It’s the economy, stupid.”

Matthew Pease

Demarest, NJ

The Issue: Mayor Adams’ drone surveillance solution to address a crime spike in Central Park.

Every day, goofball Mayor Adams comes up with another bright-light idea.

Now he wants to patrol Central Park with drones (“Eye spy in sky over Cent. Pk.,” Aug. 14).

First he started in the subways with the robot, and that idea flopped — as did the robot.
How is patrolling the park with drones going to keep it safe?

Adams should focus on stopping the migrant influx — and direct the money spent on them to spending on the NYPD: Re-fund the police department.

Years ago, the police patrolled Central Park and officers also patrolled our subway system. And they kept it safe.

Gene O’Brien

Whitestone

Our leaders continue to give the illusion of doing something to make us safe.

Metal detectors don’t stop anyone from slashing, stabbing or pushing people onto the subway tracks.

Drones won’t deter violent crime in Central Park.

The idea of using drones to stop crime is another example of avoiding addressing the actual cause of the lawlessness in the city.

Drones may get you a picture of the “evildoers,” but they will likely be released if and when they are arrested.

Charge, try and imprison guilty criminals.

This might actually help our case.

Mary Ellen Maresco

Manhattan

Want to weigh in on today’s stories? Send your thoughts (along with your full name and city of residence) to letters@nypost.com. Letters are subject to editing for clarity, length, accuracy, and style.