THE AMERICA ONE NEWS
Jun 19, 2025  |  
0
 | Remer,MN
Sponsor:  QWIKET 
Sponsor:  QWIKET 
Sponsor:  QWIKET: Elevate your fantasy game! Interactive Sports Knowledge.
Sponsor:  QWIKET: Elevate your fantasy game! Interactive Sports Knowledge and Reasoning Support for Fantasy Sports and Betting Enthusiasts.
back  
topic
NY Post
New York Post
8 Nov 2023


NextImg:Judge sides with Katy Perry to evict disabled veteran out of his home

Katy Perry and Orlando Bloom have emerged victorious in their ongoing legal battle over a lavish Montecito, California mansion previously owned by a disabled veteran Carl Westcott, as a Los Angeles judge ruled Wednesday in their favor.

In a verdict expected to become permanent after a 10-day waiting period, Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge Joseph Lipner found that Westcott had no substantial evidence to support his claim that he lacked the mental capacity to enter into contract for the property, which the couple bought for $14.2 million in 2021.

“This proposed decision is crystal clear — the judge has concluded that Mr. Westcott was in full possession of his faculties when he engaged in complex negotiations with multiple parties to finalize the lucrative sale of the property, which ultimately brought him a substantial profit,” declared Eric Rowen, attorney for Katy Perry, in a statement to Rolling Stone.

“The evidence overwhelmingly shows that Mr. Westcott breached the contract simply because he changed his mind. We eagerly anticipate resolving this matter during the scheduled damage trial phase set for February 13 and 14, if not sooner,” he added, hinting at the next legal chapter.

The estate spans over 9,100 square feet and holds eight bedrooms.
Village Properties
Katy Perry and Orlando Bloom have been accused in court docs of buying a $14.2 million Montecito home without proper consent.
Village Properties

The breach of contract trial that led to this judgment was marked by Westcott’s attorney’s assertion that his client was suffering from a degenerative brain disease, symptoms of dementia, post-operative delirium and the effects of painkillers following a back surgery when he agreed to sell his property to Perry in July 2020.

However, Judge Lipner’s preliminary ruling questioned the consistency of Westcott’s own medical expert’s testimony regarding the retired entrepreneur’s condition at the time he initiated negotiations with Perry.

Carl Westcott surrounded by family as he battles Huntington’s disease.
Facebook – Kameron Westcott

“While Dr. Gary Small testified towards the end of direct examination that he believed Westcott lacked the capacity to contract on July 15 and July 18, 2020, he failed to provide a compelling explanation of how he reached that conclusion,” the judge noted.

“Dr. Small’s testimony did not provide a sufficient basis for the court to conclude that Westcott lacked the competence to sign the sales contract.”

When the initial contract case went to trial on Sept. 27, Perry faced criticism online for seemingly attempting to evict an elderly, and infirm, man from his home against his wishes.

In response, Perry’s legal team argued that Westcott had recently purchased the stunning estate just six weeks before finalizing the deal with Perry’s representative, Bernie Gudvi.

Carl Westcott claims a week after signing a contract to sell the home that he rescinded the offer.
Village Properties

According to their argument, Westcott actively pursued negotiations with Perry, rejected her initial offer of $13.5 million, and signed a counteroffer for $15 million on July 15, 2020.

He even organized a tour of his property for Perry on July 17, 2020, agreed to extend the deadline for his counteroffer when the initial deadline passed, and criticized his agent for requesting a 5% commission.

The $15 million deal was ultimately sealed on behalf of Perry on July 18, 2020, successfully securing the coveted Montecito mansion for Perry and her family.

A look inside the home’s kitchen.
Village Properties

In a letter dated 2020, Perry, 38, and Bloom, 46, penned words of familial bliss to Westcott, stating, “As you know we are expecting a baby next month and know this will be the best place to bring her home to and raise her in.” They spoke of the home as a sanctuary where they would “grow together as a family.”

According to court documents previously obtained by The Post, the celebrity duo’s true motive was not to settle down — but to cash in.

Perry’s legal team recently sought an additional $2.67 million in damages from Westcott for holding up their ownership of the home, citing their inability to rent the house, which included unpaid cable bills.

It appears they had visions of turning the estate into a money-making venture through monthly rentals, according to court docs. This argument contradicts her earlier statement that the estate was intended for personal residence.

Still, despite Perry’s legal win, she is expected to testify at the upcoming damage trial phase, where the final chapter in this high-profile real estate saga will come to an end.

The Post has reached out to Westcott’s reps for comment.