data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/54867/54867b49a82d98d079c179f52267db883c2f44bc" alt=""
THE AMERICA ONE NEWS
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3dcd1/3dcd13ac7c7dd4ffdbcdaf9879889fb5c2bb9b80" alt=""
Feb 22, 2025 |
0
| Remer,MNSponsor: QWIKET AI
Sponsor: QWIKET AI
Sponsor: QWIKET AI: Sports Knowledge
Sponsor: QWIKET AI: Interactive Sports Knowledge.
Sponsor: QWIKET AI: Interactive Sports Knowledge and Reasoning Support.
topic
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/47345/473455f9fcdb26b44d2f72043682ef10de2d943d" alt="National Post"
National Post
30 Dec 2024
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b59c7/b59c73aef257806be38e34291ca9af7d6a629085" alt="NextImg:Ottawa-funded social justice research isn't science"
For the past decade, Ottawa politicized research funding: Liberal ministers pledged to embed diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) into research practices while bringing diversity targets to the sector; they even said outright that federal funds would be used to tinker with the demographics within the research ecosystem.
And now, in 2024, the House of Commons is finally hearing about it. In October, the science committee kicked off a study on the impact of government funding requirements on Canadian research, and, for once, invited a slate of witnesses who don’t bow to DEI dogma.