On Sunday, Mark Carney and Pierre Poilievre both delivered near 30-minute speeches to their enthusiastic supporters, but they were remarkably different in content, presentation and passion.

Carney, just elected as the new Liberal leader, appeared flat and dull as he delivered a victory speech that was high on patriotism but short on actual policies. Clearly, Carney is more at ease in front of the global elite, but he will need to become a more practiced politician if he hopes to connect with people.

Carney talked about “a plan beating no plan” and then failed to deliver even the smell of a plan. Meanwhile, Poilievre put forward a comprehensive schedule of actions{ai:summary}<p>Mark Carney and Pierre Poilievre gave contrasting speeches to their supporters on Sunday. Carney, newly elected as Liberal leader, delivered a lackluster victory speech filled with patriotism but lacking in specific policies. He may need to improve his political skills to better engage with the public. </p><p>In contrast, Poilievre's presentation was more dynamic and resonated with his audience. The differences highlight the challenges Carney faces in transitioning from a global figure to a relatable political leader. #politics</p>

Michael Higgins: Carney says we need a plan. So why didn't he give us one?

Loading...