<p data-async="">The whole point of bringing King Charles III over to deliver a <a data-evt-val="{&quot;control_fields&quot;: {&quot;mparticle&quot;: {&quot;keys&quot;: {&quot;click_source_type&quot;: &quot;click_source_type&quot;, &quot;anchor_text&quot;: &quot;anchor_text&quot;, &quot;target_url&quot;: &quot;target_url&quot;, &quot;layout_section&quot;: &quot;layout_section&quot;}, &quot;mp_event_type&quot;: &quot;Navigation&quot;, &quot;extra_keys&quot;: [&quot;click_vertical_position_percentage&quot;, &quot;click_vertical_position_pixels&quot;]}}, &quot;click_source_type&quot;: &quot;in-page link&quot;, &quot;anchor_text&quot;: &quot;throne speech&quot;, &quot;target_url&quot;: &quot;https://nationalpost.com/news/politics/full-text-speech-from-the-throne-king-charles-iii&quot;, &quot;layout_section&quot;: &quot;in-page-link&quot;}" data-evt="click" data-evt-typ="click" href="https://nationalpost.com/news/politics/full-text-speech-from-the-throne-king-charles-iii">throne speech</a> was to assert Canadian sovereignty, so it’s curious that some of the first words out of his mouth denigrated Canada’s legitimacy.</p>

The throne speech, which was supposed to be a subtle message of 'buzz off' to the United States, put Canadian sovereignty into question{ai:summary}<p>King Charles III's throne speech aimed to reinforce Canadian sovereignty, yet he began with remarks that undermined Canada's legitimacy. This contradiction raises questions about the effectiveness of the message intended to strengthen national identity. #politics</p>

Jamie Sarkonak: The King's land acknowledgement undermined his own authority

Loading...