On Thursday, the Alberta government announced that it <a data-evt-val="{&quot;control_fields&quot;: {&quot;mparticle&quot;: {&quot;keys&quot;: {&quot;click_source_type&quot;: &quot;click_source_type&quot;, &quot;anchor_text&quot;: &quot;anchor_text&quot;, &quot;target_url&quot;: &quot;target_url&quot;, &quot;layout_section&quot;: &quot;layout_section&quot;}, &quot;mp_event_type&quot;: &quot;Navigation&quot;, &quot;extra_keys&quot;: [&quot;click_vertical_position_percentage&quot;, &quot;click_vertical_position_pixels&quot;]}}, &quot;click_source_type&quot;: &quot;in-page link&quot;, &quot;anchor_text&quot;: &quot;has asked&quot;, &quot;target_url&quot;: &quot;https://kings-printer.alberta.ca/Documents/Orders/Orders_in_Council/2024/2024_316.html&quot;, &quot;layout_section&quot;: &quot;in-page-link&quot;}" data-evt="click" data-evt-typ="click" href="https://kings-printer.alberta.ca/Documents/Orders/Orders_in_Council/2024/2024_316.html">has asked</a> the Alberta Court of Appeal to provide an opinion on whether the newly amended federal Impact Assessment Act (IAA) is constitutional. The problem? The things that rendered much of the act unconstitutional, which had been pointed out by the Supreme Court last fall, were never addressed.

The Liberals were told to respect provincial jurisdiction, but their update to the federal environmental assessment regime doesn't{ai:summary}<p>The Alberta government has requested the Alberta Court of Appeal to assess the constitutionality of the amended federal Impact Assessment Act (IAA). Concerns remain as the issues identified by the Supreme Court last fall, which rendered parts of the act unconstitutional, have not been resolved. #politics</p>

Jamie Sarkonak: Alberta steps in again to protect Canada from Steven Guilbeault

Loading...